Cited by 2,365Emotion and Mood RecognitionSpeech Recognition and SynthesisPhonetics and Phonology Research

A database of German emotional speech

Burkhardt, Felix, Paeschke, A., Rolfes, M., Sendlmeier, Walter F., Weiss, Benjamin·2005·Interspeech 2005

Abstract

The article describes a database of emotional speech. Ten actors (5 female and 5 male) simulated the emotions, producing 10 German utterances (5 short and 5 longer sentences) which could be used in everyday communication and are interpretable in all applied emotions. The recordings were taken in an anechoic chamber with high-quality recording equipment. In addition to the sound electro-glottograms were recorded. The speech material comprises about 800 sentences (seven emotions * ten actors * ten sentences + some second versions). The complete database was evaluated in a perception test regarding the recognisability of emotions and their naturalness. Utterances recognised better than 80 % and judged as natural by more than 60 % of the listeners were phonetically labelled in a narrow transcription with special markers for voice-quality, phonatory and articulatory settings and articulatory features. The database can be accessed by the public via the internet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21437/interspeech.2005-446

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The feature set achieved an average recognition accuracy of 80 percent on the Berlin Database of Emotional Speech.

    “In a previous study, the feature set was evaluated on the Berlin Database of Emotional Speech [4] that is commonly used in offline research (7 emotion classes, 10 professional actors) and achieved an average recognition accuracy of 80 percent.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burkhardt, F., Paeschke, A., Rolfes, M., Sendlmeier, W. F., & Weiss, B.
Affiliations
Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Venue
Interspeech 2005
Publisher
ISCA
Published
2005-09-04
Pages
1517-1520
ISSN
2308-457X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W175750906
Cited by
2,365
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 86 · 2025: 160 · 2024: 173 · 2023: 216 · 2022: 177 · 2021: 195 · 2020: 156 · 2019: 149 · 2018: 144 · 2017: 106 · 2016: 119 · 2015: 116 · 2014: 108 · 2013: 95 · 2012: 72
FWCI
47.20
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Interspeech (USB) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
emotional speech, German speech, speech corpus, simulated emotions, phonetic transcription, voice quality, articulatory features, naturalness perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review