The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ICT4D 2.0: The Next Phase of Applying ICT for International Development
Open accessAbstract
Use of information and communication technologies for international development is moving to its next phase. This will require new technologies, new approaches to innovation, new intellectual integration, and, above all, a new view of the world's poor. The phase change from information and communication technologies for international development (ICT4D) 1.0 to ICT4D 2.0 presents opportunities for informatics professionals and offers new markets for ICT vendors. It also brings new challenges to our established methods of working and emphasizes the need for new expertise and new world views. The paper have shown that ICT4D 2.0 focuses on reframing the poor. Where ICT4D 1.0 marginalized them, allowing a supply-driven focus, ICT4D 2.0 centralizes them, creating a demand-driven focus. Where ICT4D 1.0 - fortified by the "bottom of the pyramid" concept - characterized the poor largely as passive consumers, ICT4D 2.0 sees them as active producers and innovators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations
Heeks, R. (2002) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972240290075039 · Cited by 1,390
Self-citation
Cited by
Digital Literacy: A Review of Literature
Reddy, P., Sharma, B., & Chaudhary, K. (2020) · International Journal of Technoethics · doi:10.4018/ijt.20200701.oa1 · Cited by 398
The Evolution of an ICT Platform-Enabled Ecosystem for Poverty Alleviation: The Case of Ekutir1
Jha, S. K., Pinsonneault, A., & Dubé, L. (2016) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2016/40.2.08 · Cited by 161
Best, M. L., & Kumar, R. (2008) · Information Technologies and International Development · doi:10.1162/itid.2008.00025 · Cited by 157
Configurable politics and asymmetric integration: Health e-infrastructures in India
University of Oslo, Sahay, S., Monteiro, E., The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Aanestad, M., & University of Oslo (2009) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00198 · Cited by 109
Quaicoe, J. S., & Pata, K. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10158-8 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Heeks, R.
- Venue
- Computer
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 26-33
- ISSN
- 0018-9162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165016052
- Cited by
- 639
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 122.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.