Cited by 184Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityDigital Transformation in LawLogic, programming, and type systems

Validation and Verification of Smart Contracts: A Research Agenda

Open access
Magazzeni, Daniele, McBurney, Peter, Nash, William·2017·Computer

Abstract

Smart contracts might encode legal contracts written in natural language to represent the contracting parties' shared understandings and intentions. The issues and research challenges involved in the validation and verification of smart contracts, particularly those running over blockchains and distributed ledgers, are explored.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mc.2017.3571045

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such integration allows intelligent decentralized autonomous agents (or DAOs) to validate data, value, and asset transfers among numerous authorities automatically and quickly.

    “Such integration allows intelligent decentralized autonomous agents (or DAOs) to validate data, value, and asset transfers among numerous authorities automatically and quickly”

    From Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence Technology in E-Health (2021) · cites this paper as Magazzeni et al. 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Magazzeni, D., McBurney, P., & Nash, W.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Venue
Computer
Published
2017
Volume
50
Issue
9
Pages
50-57
ISSN
0018-9162 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2758225150
Cited by
184
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 1
FWCI
41.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computer (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
University College London
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Digital Transformation in Law
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, programming, and type systems
Keywords
smart contracts, validation, verification, blockchain, distributed ledger technology, contracts, research challenges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review