CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 33

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluating Existing Strategies to Limit Video Game Playing Time

Davies, Bryan, Blake, Edwin·2016·IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications
DOI 10.1109/mcg.2016.25
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Public concern surrounding the effects video games have on players has inspired a large body of research, and policy makers in China and South Korea have even mandated systems that limit the amount of time players spend in game. The authors present an experiment that evaluates the effectiveness of such policies. They show that forcibly removing players from the game environment causes distress, potentially removing some of the benefits that games provide and producing a desire for more game time. They also show that, with an understanding of player psychology, playtime can be manipulated without significantly changing the user experience or negating the positive effects of video games.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mcg.2016.25

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Csikszentmihalyi, 1990, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Performance
  2. 10.4018/978-1-4666-3990-4.ch003 · DOI
  3. 10.1145/1232743.1232769 · DOI
  4. 10.1089/109493104322820057 · DOI
  5. Kelly, 2014, Don’t Juice It or Lose It
  6. 10.1007/s11469-009-9206-4 · DOI
  7. Parkin, 2015, Death by Video Game, Tales of Obsession from the Virtual Frontline
  8. 10.1007/s11126-007-9056-9 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.014 · DOI
  10. 10.1556/jba.3.2014.002 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0087819 · DOI
  12. 10.3109/16066359.2013.812203 · DOI
  13. Kelly, 2009, A Primer of Affect Psychology
  14. 10.1177/0022022106297301 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1007/s11031-008-9102-4 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 33

Metadata

Authors
Davies, B., & Blake, E.
Venue
IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
2016-03
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
47-57
ISSN
0272-1716
DOI
10.1109/mcg.2016.25
Cited by
33
References
2
Licence
ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplorehelp/downloads/license-information/IEEE.html (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review