Cited by 221Advanced Wireless Network OptimizationAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesWireless Communication Networks Research

Is the PHY layer dead?

Open access
Dohler, M., Heath, R.W., Lozano, A., Papadias, C.B., Valenzuela, R.A.·2011·IEEE Communications Magazine

Abstract

This article originates from a panel with the above title, held at IEEE VTC Spring 2009, in which the authors took part. The enthusiastic response it received prompted us to discuss for a wider audience whether research at the physical layer (PHY) is still relevant to the field of wireless communications. Using cellular systems as the axis of our exposition, we exemplify areas where PHY research has indeed hit a performance wall and where any improvements are expected to be marginal. We then discuss whether the research directions taken in the past have always been the right choice and how lessons learned could influence future policy decisions. Several of the raised issues are subsequently discussed in greater details, e.g., the growing divergence between academia and industry. With this argumentation at hand, we identify areas that are either under-developed or likely to be of impact in coming years — hence corroborating the relevance and importance of PHY research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mcom.2011.5741160

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 5G contains no ground-breaking technology.

    “Although 5G has adopted a gradual evolution strategy that is able to provide much more and better services than 4G, there is no ground-breaking technology in 5G.”

    From What should 6G be? (2020) · cites this paper as [18]

  • 5G inherits the fundamental performance enhancement mechanisms since 4G, and its performance gains are achieved through investment in more spectral and hardware resources.

    “Instead, it inherits the fundamental performance enhancement mechanisms since 4G, and performance gains are achieved through an investment in more spectral and hardware resources [18].”

    From What should 6G be? (2020) · cites this paper as [18]

  • We are squeezing the last lemon juice of Shannon's treatise published in 1948 and almost reach the hard wall set by information theory.

    “As detailed in [18], we are squeezing the last lemon juice of Shannon's treatise published in 1948 and almost reach the hard wall set by information theory.”

    From What should 6G be? (2020) · cites this paper as [18]

  • In the wireless communication research community, it is widely agreed that the most efficient ways to enhance wireless communication systems are to expand usage to high-frequency spectrum and to reduce the coverage of a single cell.

    “In the wireless communication research community, it is widely agreed that the most efficient ways to enhance wireless communication systems are to expand the usage to highfrequency spectrum and to reduce the coverage of a single cell [18].”

    From What should 6G be? (2020) · cites this paper as [18]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. M. K. Karakayali, G. J. Foschini, R. A. Valenzuela, "Network coordination for spectrally efficient communications in cellular systems," IEEE Wireless Communications, Vol. 13, Aug. 2006, pp. 56-61.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dohler, M., Heath, R. W., Lozano, A., Papadias, C. B., & Valenzuela, R. A.
Affiliations
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
Venue
IEEE Communications Magazine
Published
2011-04
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
159-165
ISSN
0163-6804 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148454256
Cited by
221
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 30
FWCI
19.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Communications Magazine (publishedVersion)
  • Hispana (acceptedVersion)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • University of Minnesota
  • Athens University of Economics and Business
  • University of Texas at Austin
  • University of Southampton
  • Technische Universität Dresden
  • Universität Wien
  • Technische Universität Wien
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Network Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Wireless Communication Networks Research
Keywords
physical layer, wireless communication, cellular systems, performance bounds, industry-academia gap, science policy, future research directions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review