The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lidar System Architectures and Circuits
Abstract
3D imaging technologies are applied in numerous areas, including self-driving cars, drones, and robots, and in advanced industrial, medical, scientific, and consumer applications. 3D imaging is usually accomplished by finding the distance to multiple points on an object or in a scene, and then creating a point cloud of those range measurements. Different methods can be used for the ranging. Some of these methods, such as stereovision, rely on processing 2D images. Other techniques estimate the distance more directly by measuring the round-trip delay of an ultrasonic or electromagnetic wave to the object. Ultrasonic waves suffer large losses in air and cannot reach distances beyond a few meters. Radars and lidars use electromagnetic waves in radio and optical spectra, respectively. The shorter wavelengths of the optical waves compared to the radio frequency waves translates into better resolution, and a more favorable choice for 3D imaging. The integration of lidars on electronic and photonic chips can lower their cost, size, and power consumption, making them affordable and accessible to all the abovementioned applications. This review article explains different lidar aspects and design choices, such as optical modulation and detection techniques, and point cloud generation by means of beam-steering or flashing an entire scene. Popular lidar architectures and circuits are presented, and the superiority of the FMCW lidar is discussed in terms of range resolution, receiver sensitivity, and compatibility with emerging technologies. At the end, an electronic-photonic integrated circuit for a micro-imaging FMCW lidar is presented as an example.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Probability and Information Theory with Applications to Radar
(1953) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-05390-x · Cited by 1,283
Large-scale nanophotonic phased array
Sun, J., Timurdogan, E., Yaacobi, A., Hosseini, E. S., & Watts, M. R. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11727 · Cited by 1,275
Off-chip beam steering with a one-dimensional optical phased array on silicon-on-insulator
Van Acoleyen, K., Bogaerts, W., Jágerská, J., Le Thomas, N., Houdré, R., & Baets, R. (2009) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.34.001477 · Cited by 392
Design and characterization of a CMOS 3-D image sensor based on single photon avalanche diodes
Niclass, C., Rochas, A., Besse, P.-A., & Edoardo Charbon, A. (2005) · IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · doi:10.1109/jssc.2005.848173 · Cited by 379
Uttam, D., & Culshaw, B. (1985) · Journal of Lightwave Technology · doi:10.1109/jlt.1985.1074315 · Cited by 242
Velodyne HDL-64E lidar for unmanned surface vehicle obstacle detection
Halterman, R., & Bruch, M. (2010) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.850611 · Cited by 141
Electronic-Photonic Integrated Circuit for 3D Microimaging
Behroozpour, B., Sandborn, P. A. M., Quack, N., Seok, T. J., Matsui, Y., Wu, M. C., & Boser, B. E. (2016) · IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · doi:10.1109/jssc.2016.2621755 · Cited by 116
Self-citationA 32 × 32 optical phased array using polysilicon sub-wavelength high-contrast-grating mirrors
Yoo, B., Megens, M. M., Sun, T., Yang, W., Chang-Hasnain, C. J., Horsley, D. A., & Wu, M. C. (2014) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.22.019029 · Cited by 50
Self-citation
Cited by
Massively parallel coherent laser ranging using a soliton microcomb
Riemensberger, J., Lukashchuk, A., Karpov, M., Weng, W., Lucas, E., Liu, J., & Kippenberg, T. J. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2239-3 · Cited by 726
A large-scale microelectromechanical-systems-based silicon photonics LiDAR
Zhang, X., Kwon, K., Henriksson, J., Luo, J., & Wu, M. C. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04415-8 · Cited by 438
Self-citationA universal 3D imaging sensor on a silicon photonics platform
Rogers, C., Piggott, A. Y., Thomson, D. J., Wiser, R. F., Opris, I. E., Fortune, S. A., Compston, A. J., Gondarenko, A., Meng, F., Chen, X., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03259-y · Cited by 405
A Single-Chip Optical Phased Array in a Wafer-Scale Silicon Photonics/CMOS 3D-Integration Platform
Kim, T., Ngai, T., Timalsina, Y., Watts, M. R., Stojanovic, V., Bhargava, P., Poulton, C. V., Notaros, J., Yaacobi, A., Timurdogan, E., et al. (2019) · IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · doi:10.1109/jssc.2019.2934601 · Cited by 166
Xue, Y., Gan, R., Chen, K., Chen, G., Ruan, Z., Zhang, J., Liu, J., Dai, D., Guo, C., & Liu, L. (2022) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.470596 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Behroozpour, B., Sandborn, P. A. M., Wu, M. C., & Boser, B. E.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Magazine
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 135-142
- ISSN
- 0163-6804 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2762897752
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 16.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lidar System Architectures and Circuits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/mcom.2017.1700030
- The paper
- Behroozpour, B., Sandborn, P. A. M., Wu, M. C., & Boser, B. E. (2017). Lidar System Architectures and Circuits. IEEE Communications Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2017.1700030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.