Cited by 64Smart Cities and TechnologiesMobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingBig Data Technologies and Applications

Soft Sensing in Smart Cities: Handling 3Vs Using Recommender Systems, Machine Intelligence, and Data Analytics

Habibzadeh, Hadi, Boggio-Dandry, Andrew, Qin, Zhou, Soyata, Tolga, Kantarci, Burak, Mouftah, Hussein T.·2018·IEEE Communications Magazine

Abstract

Today's existing smart city research involves many overtly futuristic applications such as smart transportation, in which smart roads warn drivers of bad traffic conditions ahead, smart parking, which communicates the location of unoccupied parking spaces to drivers, and smart environment, which enables fully automated homes and workplaces to adjust their temperature to conserve energy. The realization of these applications hinges on a data acquisition structure that gathers its data from a countless number of sensors, either deployed for predefined tasks (hard sensing) or built into the mobile devices of smart city residents (soft sensing). At the core of this big data infrastructure lie the 5Vs: veracity, volume, velocity, variety, and value. The soft sensing component of a smart city sensing network is particularly affected by 3Vs: veracity, volume, and velocity. To address the unique challenges of big data, recommender systems, statistical reputation systems, and context analysis are used to ensure the veracity of acquired data, machine learning algorithms are applied to handle the data volume, and data analytics algorithms are implemented to manage data velocity. Despite its seemingly insurmountable size, the acquired data is highly redundant, and systematic use of machine intelligence and data analytics can facilitate processing by extracting only the relevant information; in this article, we study the role of these algorithms through the lens of the 3Vs in facilitating soft sensing within the framework of smart city applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mcom.2018.1700304

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hard sensing is the primary data collection paradigm in many smart city applications, as it is adapted to precisely meet the application requirements.

    “Hard sensing is the primary data collection paradigm in many smart city applications, as it is adapted to precisely meet the application requirements.”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [319]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Habibzadeh, H., Boggio-Dandry, A., Qin, Z., Soyata, T., Kantarci, B., & Mouftah, H. T.
Affiliations
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
  • National University of Defense Technology (CN)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Venue
IEEE Communications Magazine
Published
2018-02
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
78-86
ISSN
0163-6804 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2785766274
Cited by
64
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Communications Magazine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
Keywords
soft sensing, smart cities, data veracity, data volume, data velocity, recommender systems, contextual analysis, machine learning, data analytics, sensor networks, big data, data redundancy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review