The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Deep Learning: The Frontier for Distributed Attack Detection in Fog-to-Things Computing
Open accessAbstract
The increase in the number and diversity of smart objects has raised substantial cybersecurity challenges due to the recent exponential rise in the occurrence and sophistication of attacks. Although cloud computing has transformed the world of business in a dramatic way, its centralization hammers the application of distributed services such as security mechanisms for IoT applications. The new and emerging IoT applications require novel cybersecurity controls, models, and decisions distributed at the edge of the network. Despite the success of the existing cryptographic solutions in the traditional Internet, factors such as system development flaws, increased attack surfaces, and hacking skills have proven the inevitability of detection mechanisms. The traditional approaches such as classical machine-learning-based attack detection mechanisms have been successful in the last decades, but it has already been proven that they have low accuracy and less scalability for cyber-attack detection in massively distributed nodes such as IoT. The proliferation of deep learning and hardware technology advancement could pave a way to detecting the current level of sophistication of cyber-attacks in edge networks. The application of deep networks has already been successful in big data areas, and this indicates that fog-tothings computing can be the ultimate beneficiary of the approach for attack detection because a massive amount of data produced by IoT devices enable deep models to learn better than shallow algorithms. In this article, we propose a novel distributed deep learning scheme of cyber-attack detection in fog-to-things computing. Our experiments show that deep models are superior to shallow models in detection accuracy, false alarm rate, and scalability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Survey
Lim, W. Y. B., Luong, N. C., Hoang, D. T., Jiao, Y., Liang, Y.-C., Yang, Q., Niyato, D., & Miao, C. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2986024 · Cited by 2,565
A Survey of Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Internet of Things (IoT) Security
Al-Garadi, M. A., Mohamed, A., Al-Ali, A. K., Du, X., Ali, I., & Guizani, M. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2988293 · Cited by 1,392
All one needs to know about fog computing and related edge computing paradigms: A complete survey
Yousefpour, A., Fung, C., Nguyen, T., Kadiyala, K., Jalali, F., Niakanlahiji, A., Kong, J., & Jue, J. P. (2019) · Journal of Systems Architecture · doi:10.1016/j.sysarc.2019.02.009 · Cited by 1,368
Xie, J., Yu, F. R., Huang, T., Xie, R., Liu, J., Wang, C., & Liu, Y. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2866942 · Cited by 700
A Survey of Deep Learning Methods for Cyber Security
Berman, D. S., Buczak, A. L., Chavis, J. S., & Corbett, C. L. (2019) · Information · doi:10.3390/info10040122 · Cited by 569
Metadata
- Authors
- Abeshu, A., & Chilamkurti, N.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Magazine
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 169-175
- ISSN
- 0163-6804 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2786075294
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep Learning: The Frontier for Distributed Attack Detection in Fog-to-Things Computing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/mcom.2018.1700332
- The paper
- Abeshu, A., & Chilamkurti, N. (2018). Deep Learning: The Frontier for Distributed Attack Detection in Fog-to-Things Computing. IEEE Communications Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2018.1700332
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.