Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 836

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Demystifying 3D ICs: The Pros and Cons of Going Vertical

Davis, W.R., Wilson, J., Mick, S., Jian Xu, Hao Hua, Mineo, C., Sule, A.M., Steer, M., Franzon, P.D.·2005·IEEE Design and Test of Computers

Abstract

This article provides a practical introduction to the design trade-offs of the currently available 3D IC technology options. It begins with an overview of techniques, such as wire bonding, microbumps, through vias, and contactless interconnection, comparing them in terms of vertical density and practical limits to their use. We then present a high-level discussion of the pros and cons of 3D technologies, with an analysis relating the number of transistors on a chip to the vertical interconnect density using estimates based on Rent's rule. Next, we provide a more detailed design example of inductively coupled interconnects, with measured results of a system fabricated in a 0.35-μm technology and an analysis of misalignment and crosstalk tolerances. Lastly, we present a case study of a fast Fourier transform (FFT) placed and routed in a 0.18-μm through-via silicon-on-insulator (SOI) technology, comparing the 3D design to a traditional 2D approach in terms of wire length and critical-path delay.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mdt.2005.136

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 836

Metadata

Authors
Davis, W. R., Wilson, J., Mick, S., Xu, J., Hua, H., Mineo, C., Sule, A. M., Steer, M., & Franzon, P. D.
Venue
IEEE Design and Test of Computers
Published
2005-06
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
498-510
ISSN
0740-7475 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023264348
Cited by
836
References
2
FWCI
29.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Demystifying 3D ICs: The Pros and Cons of Going Vertical. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/mdt.2005.136
The paper
Davis, W. R., Wilson, J., Mick, S., Xu, J., Hua, H., Mineo, C., Sule, A. M., Steer, M., & Franzon, P. D. (2005). Demystifying 3D ICs: The Pros and Cons of Going Vertical. IEEE Design and Test of Computers. https://doi.org/10.1109/mdt.2005.136

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.