Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 363

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrating MEMS and ICs

Open access
Fischer, Andreas C., Forsberg, Fredrik, Lapisa, Martin, Bleiker, Simon J., Stemme, Göran, Roxhed, Niclas, Niklaus, Frank·2015·Microsystems & Nanoengineering

Abstract

The majority of microelectromechanical system (MEMS) devices must be combined with integrated circuits (ICs) for operation in larger electronic systems. While MEMS transducers sense or control physical, optical or chemical quantities, ICs typically provide functionalities related to the signals of these transducers, such as analog-to-digital conversion, amplification, filtering and information processing as well as communication between the MEMS transducer and the outside world. Thus, the vast majority of commercial MEMS products, such as accelerometers, gyroscopes and micro-mirror arrays, are integrated and packaged together with ICs. There are a variety of possible methods of integrating and packaging MEMS and IC components, and the technology of choice strongly depends on the device, the field of application and the commercial requirements. In this review paper, traditional as well as innovative and emerging approaches to MEMS and IC integration are reviewed. These include approaches based on the hybrid integration of multiple chips (multi-chip solutions) as well as system-on-chip solutions based on wafer-level monolithic integration and heterogeneous integration techniques. These are important technological building blocks for the ‘More-Than-Moore’ paradigm described in the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors. In this paper, the various approaches are categorized in a coherent manner, their merits are discussed, and suitable application areas and implementations are critically investigated. The implications of the different MEMS and IC integration approaches for packaging, testing and final system costs are reviewed. Combining micrometer-sized movable components and electronic devices adds functionality to integrated circuits. Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) are flexible transducers that can measure acceleration or the presence of chemicals, to give just two examples. Andreas C. Fischer and colleagues from the KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden review both traditional and emerging approaches forplacing MEMS on the same platform as the electronics needed to process the electrical signals they produce, thus producing smaller and cheaper components. Such approaches include creating the MEMS and electronics on separate substrates and then combining them, or developing fabrication processes that are able to define both types of device on the same substrate. The researchers conclude that the most cost-effective solution depends on the specific application.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/micronano.2015.5

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

See all 363

Metadata

Authors
Fischer, A. C., Forsberg, F., Lapisa, M., Bleiker, S. J., Stemme, G., Roxhed, N., & Niklaus, F.
Venue
Microsystems & Nanoengineering
Published
2015-05-28
Volume
1
Issue
1
ISSN
2055-7434 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3103527158
Cited by
363
References
47
FWCI
17.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating MEMS and ICs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/micronano.2015.5
The paper
Fischer, A. C., Forsberg, F., Lapisa, M., Bleiker, S. J., Stemme, G., Roxhed, N., & Niklaus, F. (2015). Integrating MEMS and ICs. Microsystems & Nanoengineering. https://doi.org/10.1038/micronano.2015.5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.