Cited by 28Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsHuman Pose and Action RecognitionHand Gesture Recognition Systems

Multi-modal human action recognition using deep neural networks fusing image and inertial sensor data

Hwang, Inhwan, Cha, Geonho, Oh, Songhwai·2017·2017 IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems (MFI)

Abstract

Human action recognition has been studied in many fields including computer vision and sensor networks using inertial sensors. However, there are limitations such as spatial constraints, occlusions in images, sensor unreliability, and the inconvenience of users. In order to solve these problems we suggest a sensor fusion method for human action recognition exploiting RGB images from a single fixed camera and a single wrist mounted inertial sensor. These two different domain information can complement each other to fill the deficiencies that exist in both image based and inertial sensor based human action recognition methods. We propose two convolutional neural network (CNN) based feature extraction networks for image and inertial sensor data and a recurrent neural network (RNN) based classification network with long short term memory (LSTM) units. Training of deep neural networks and testing are done with synchronized images and sensor data collected from five individuals. The proposed method results in better performance compared to single sensor-based methods with an accuracy of 86.9% in cross-validation. We also verify that the proposed algorithm robustly classifies the target action when there are failures in detecting body joints from images.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mfi.2017.8170441

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The combination setting outperformed camera-only and IMU-only systems for action classification.

    “The cross-validated accuracy for action classification showed that the combination setting outperformed camera-only and IMU-only systems.”
  • A NN system based on IMU sensor data can help physicians in situations when action recognition approaches based on cameras fail to reliably forecast the precise human position.

    “According to the findings, a NN system based on IMU sensor data can help physicians in situations when action recognition approaches based on cameras fail to reliably forecast the precise human position [172].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hwang, I., Cha, G., & Oh, S.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Venue
2017 IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems (MFI)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-11
Pages
278-283
OpenAlex
W2775529075
Cited by
28
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.56
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems (MFI) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Samsung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
Keywords
human action recognition, multimodal sensor fusion, inertial sensors, RGB images, wrist-worn sensors, convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, LSTM, wearable sensors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review