Cited by 168Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

RETRACTED: FL-PMI: Federated Learning-Based Person Movement Identification through Wearable Devices in Smart Healthcare Systems

Open access
Arikumar, K., Prathiba, Sahaya, Alazab, Mamoun, Gadekallu, Thippa, Pandya, Sharnil, Khan, Javed, Moorthy, Rajalakshmi·2022·Sensors

Abstract

Recent technological developments, such as the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence, edge, and cloud computing, have paved the way in transforming traditional healthcare systems into smart healthcare (SHC) systems. SHC escalates healthcare management with increased efficiency, convenience, and personalization, via use of wearable devices and connectivity, to access information with rapid responses. Wearable devices are equipped with multiple sensors to identify a person’s movements. The unlabeled data acquired from these sensors are directly trained in the cloud servers, which require vast memory and high computational costs. To overcome this limitation in SHC, we propose a federated learning-based person movement identification (FL-PMI). The deep reinforcement learning (DRL) framework is leveraged in FL-PMI for auto-labeling the unlabeled data. The data are then trained using federated learning (FL), in which the edge servers allow the parameters alone to pass on the cloud, rather than passing vast amounts of sensor data. Finally, the bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) in FL-PMI classifies the data for various processes associated with the SHC. The simulation results proved the efficiency of FL-PMI, with 99.67% accuracy scores, minimized memory usage and computational costs, and reduced transmission data by 36.73%.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s22041377This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7]Wu M. Luo J. Wearable technology applications in healthcare: A literature review Online J. Nurs. Inform. 2019 23
  2. [32]Gadekallu T.R. Pham Q.V. Huynh-The T. Bhattacharya S. Maddikunta P.K.R. Liyanage M. Federated Learning for Big Data: A Survey on Opportunities, Applications, and Future Directions arXiv 2021 2110.04160

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arikumar, K., Prathiba, S., Alazab, M., Gadekallu, T., Pandya, S., Khan, J., & Moorthy, R.
Affiliations
  • Department of Computer Science and Engineering, St. Joseph’s Institute of Technology, Chennai 600119, India
  • Anna University, Chennai (IN)
  • Charles Darwin University (AU)
  • Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
  • Symbiosis International University (IN)
  • King Saud University (SA)
  • Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (IN)
Corresponding author
Gadekallu, Thippa
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-02-11
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
1377
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4211249696
Cited by
168
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 27
FWCI
11.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA (Linnaeus University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
King Saud University (RSP-2021/360, RSP-2021)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
federated learning, wearable devices, smart healthcare, deep reinforcement learning, auto-labeling, unlabeled data, edge computing, bidirectional LSTM, Internet of Things, memory and computational cost reduction
MeSH terms
Cloud Computing, Wearable Electronic Devices, Internet of Things, Artificial Intelligence, Delivery of Health Care, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review