The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A framework and ontology for dynamic Web services selection
Abstract
Current Web services standards lack the means for expressing a service's nonfunctional attributes - namely, its quality of service. QoS can be objective (encompassing reliability, availability, and request-to-response time) or subjective (focusing on user experience). QoS attributes are key to dynamically selecting the services that best meet user needs. This article addresses dynamic service selection via an agent framework coupled with a QoS ontology. With this approach, participants can collaborate to determine each other's service quality and trustworthiness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The vision of autonomic computing
Kephart, J. O., & Chess, D. M. (2003) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2003.1160055 · Cited by 6,572
A model for web services discovery with QoS
Ran, S. (2003) · ACM SIGecom Exchanges · doi:10.1145/844357.844360 · Cited by 999
An evidential model of distributed reputation management
Yu, B., & Singh, M. P. (2002) · Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems part 1 - AAMAS '02 · doi:10.1145/544805.544809 · Cited by 449
Self-citationAn evidential model of distributed reputation management
Yu, B., & Singh, M. P. (2002) · Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: part 1 · doi:10.1145/544741.544809 · Cited by 342
Self-citation
Cited by
Context Aware Computing for The Internet of Things: A Survey
Perera, C., Zaslavsky, A., Christen, P., & Georgakopoulos, D. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2013.042313.00197 · Cited by 2,861
“Similar challenges have been addressed in the web service domain during the last decade [230], [231] where we can learn from those efforts.”
BackgroundA survey on service quality description
Kritikos, K., Pernici, B., Plebani, P., Cappiello, C., Comuzzi, M., Benrernou, S., Brandic, I., Kertész, A., Parkin, M., & Carro, M. (2013) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2522968.2522969 · Cited by 323
Toward autonomic web services trust and selection
Maximilien, E. M., & Singh, M. P. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Service oriented computing · doi:10.1145/1035167.1035198 · Cited by 305
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Maximilien, E. M., & Singh, M. P.
- Venue
- IEEE Internet Computing
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 84-93
- ISSN
- 1089-7801 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165525206
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 135.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A framework and ontology for dynamic Web services selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/mic.2004.27
- The paper
- Maximilien, E. M., & Singh, M. P. (2004). A framework and ontology for dynamic Web services selection. IEEE Internet Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/mic.2004.27
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
