The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A survey on service quality description
Open accessAbstract
Quality of service (QoS) can be a critical element for achieving the business goals of a service provider, for the acceptance of a service by the user, or for guaranteeing service characteristics in a composition of services, where a service is defined as either a software or a software-support (i.e., infrastructural) service which is available on any type of network or electronic channel. The goal of this article is to compare the approaches to QoS description in the literature, where several models and metamodels are included. consider a large spectrum of models and metamodels to describe service quality, ranging from ontological approaches to define quality measures, metrics, and dimensions, to metamodels enabling the specification of quality-based service requirements and capabilities as well as of SLAs (Service-Level Agreements) and SLA templates for service provisioning. Our survey is performed by inspecting the characteristics of the available approaches to reveal which are the consolidated ones and which are the ones specific to given aspects and to analyze where the need for further research and investigation lies. The approaches here illustrated have been selected based on a systematic review of conference proceedings and journals spanning various research areas in computer science and engineering, including: distributed, information, and telecommunication systems, networks and security, and service-oriented and grid computing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lectu re Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems
Beckmann, M. J., & Künzi, H. P. (1975) · Cited by 2,414
Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement
Batini, C., Cappiello, C., Francalanci, C., & Maurino, A. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541883 · Cited by 1,288
Self-citationService quality models: a review
Seth, N., Deshmukh, S. G., & Vrat, P. (2005) · International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management · doi:10.1108/02656710510625211 · Cited by 1,002
A model for web services discovery with QoS
Ran, S. (2003) · ACM SIGecom Exchanges · doi:10.1145/844357.844360 · Cited by 999
Cloud Computing: Distributed Internet Computing for IT and Scientific Research
Dikaiakos, M. D., Katsaros, D., Mehra, P., Pallis, G., & Vakali, A. (2009) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2009.103 · Cited by 795
Data Quality For The Information Age
Redman, T. C., & Godfrey, A. B. (1997) · Cited by 695
A framework and ontology for dynamic Web services selection
Maximilien, E. M., & Singh, M. P. (2004) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2004.27 · Cited by 567
Handbook of Constraint Programming (Foundations of Artificial Intelligence)
Rossi, F., van Beek, P., & Walsh, T. (2006) · Elsevier eBooks · Cited by 330
O'Sullivan, J., Edmond, D., & ter Hofstede, A. (2002) · Distributed and Parallel Databases · doi:10.1023/a:1016547000822 · Cited by 315
Aamir, T., Bouguettaya, A., Dong, H., Mistry, S., & Erradi, A. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69035-3 · Cited by 306
Cited by
The SKINNY Family of Block Ciphers and Its Low-Latency Variant MANTIS
Beierle, C., Jean, J., Kölbl, S., Leander, G., Moradi, A., Peyrin, T., Sasaki, Y., Sasdrich, P., & Sim, S. M. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53008-5_5 · Cited by 689
A survey of swarm intelligence for dynamic optimization: Algorithms and applications
Mavrovouniotis, M., Li, C., & Yang, S. (2017) · Swarm and Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2016.12.005 · Cited by 585
Cyber physical systems security: analysis, challenges and solutions
Ashibani, Y., & Mahmoud, Q. H. (2017) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2017.04.005 · Cited by 447
Banos, O., Villalonga, C., Garcia, R., Saez, A., Damas, M., Holgado-Terriza, J. A., Lee, S., Pomares, H., & Rojas, I. (2015) · BioMedical Engineering OnLine · doi:10.1186/1475-925x-14-s2-s6 · Cited by 321
Web Service Composition: A Survey of Techniques and Tools
Lemos, A. L., Daniel, F., & Benatallah, B. (2016) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2831270 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Kritikos, K., Pernici, B., Plebani, P., Cappiello, C., Comuzzi, M., Benrernou, S., Brandic, I., Kertész, A., Parkin, M., & Carro, M.
- Venue
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Published
- 2013-07-11
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-58
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7341
- OpenAlex
- W2169036685
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 96.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A survey on service quality description. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2522968.2522969
- The paper
- Kritikos, K., Pernici, B., Plebani, P., Cappiello, C., Comuzzi, M., Benrernou, S., Brandic, I., Kertész, A., Parkin, M., & Carro, M. (2013). A survey on service quality description. ACM Computing Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1145/2522968.2522969
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
