Cited by 78Speech and dialogue systemsAI in Service InteractionsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Approaches for Dialog Management in Conversational Agents

Open access
Harms, Jan-Gerrit, Kucherbaev, Pavel, Bozzon, Alessandro, Houben, Geert-Jan·2019·IEEE Internet Computing

Abstract

Dialog agents, like digital assistants and automated chat interfaces (e.g., chatbots), are becoming more and more popular as users adapt to conversing with their devices as they do with humans. In this paper, we present approaches and available tools for dialog management (DM), a component of dialog agents that handles dialog context and decides the next action for the agent to take. In this paper, we establish an overview of the field of DM, compare approaches and state-of-the-art tools in industry and research work on a set of dimensions, and identify directions for further research work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mic.2018.2881519

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Understanding the context of conversations is of utmost importance to create natural, believable interactions between intelligent virtual assistants and humans.

    “To create natural, believable interactions between intelligent virtual assistants and humans, understanding the context of conversations is of utmost importance (Harms et al., 2018).”
  • This is a common drawback of existing dialogue systems.

    “This is a common drawback of existing dialogue systems (Fitzpatrick et al., 2017; Harms et al., 2018).”
  • Great efforts are being made in this promising research field to create natural 'human-like' conversations, including the exploration of conversational robots and voice-based systems for supporting cognitive impaired individuals.

    “Nevertheless, great efforts are being made in this promising research field to create natural ‘human-like’ conversations (Harms et al., 2018; Griol et al., 2019) 6 , including the exploration of conversational robots and voice-based systems for supporting cognitive impaired individuals (Cruz-Sandoval et al., 2020; Pou-Prom et al., 2020; Salichs et al., 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. A. Bordes, Y.-L. Boureau, and J. Weston, "Learning end-to-end goal-oriented dialog," in Proc. ICLR, 2016, March/April 2019 pp. 1-15. Available at: https://openreview.net/pdf?id¼ S1Bb3D5gg

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harms, J.-G., Kucherbaev, P., Bozzon, A., & Houben, G.-J.
Affiliations
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Venue
IEEE Internet Computing
Published
2019-03-01
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
13-22
ISSN
  • 1089-7801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0131
OpenAlex
W2901591336
Cited by
78
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Internet Computing (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
dialogue management, dialogue agents, chatbots, virtual assistants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review