The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DIVA: a reliable substrate for deep submicron microarchitecture design
Abstract
Building a high-performance microprocessor presents many reliability challenges. Designers must verify the correctness of large complex systems and construct implementations that work reliably in varied (and occasionally adverse) operating conditions. To further complicate this task, deep submicron fabrication technologies present new reliability challenges in the form of degraded signal quality and logic failures caused by natural radiation interference. In this paper, we introduce dynamic verification, a novel microarchitectural technique that can significantly reduce the burden of correctness in microprocessor designs. The approach works by augmenting the commit phase of the processor pipeline with a functional checker unit. The functional checker verifies the correctness of the core processor's computation, only permitting correct results to commit. Overall design cost can be dramatically reduced because designers need only verify the correctness of the checker unit. We detail the DIVA checker architecture, a design optimized for simplicity and low cost. Using detailed timing simulation, we show that even resource-frugal DIVA checkers have little impact on core processor performance. To make the case for reduced verification costs, we argue that the DIVA checker should lend itself to functional and electrical verification better than a complex core processor. Finally, future applications that leverage dynamic verification to increase processor performance and availability are suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The SimpleScalar tool set, version 2.0
Burger, D., & Austin, T. M. (1997) · ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News · doi:10.1145/268806.268810 · Cited by 3,048
Self-citationPrinciples of CMOS VLSI Design: A Systems Perspective
Weste, N. H. E., & Eshraghian, K. (1985) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 1,566
Alpha-particle-induced soft errors in dynamic memories
May, T. C., & Woods, M. H. (1979) · IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices · doi:10.1109/t-ed.1979.19370 · Cited by 864
The theory and practice of reliable system design
Siewiorek, D. P., & Swarz, R. S. (1982) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 738
Interconnect scaling-the real limiter to high performance ULSI
Bohr, M. T. (2002) · Proceedings of International Electron Devices Meeting · doi:10.1109/iedm.1995.499187 · Cited by 552
Cited by
Borkar, S. (2005) · IEEE Micro · doi:10.1109/mm.2005.110 · Cited by 1,320
Metadata
- Authors
- Austin, T. M.
- Venue
- MICRO-32. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Microarchitecture
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2003-01-20
- Pages
- 196-207
- OpenAlex
- W4248445118
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 37.69
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DIVA: a reliable substrate for deep submicron microarchitecture design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/micro.1999.809458
- The paper
- Austin, T. M. (2003). DIVA: a reliable substrate for deep submicron microarchitecture design. MICRO-32. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Microarchitecture. https://doi.org/10.1109/micro.1999.809458
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.