The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Space/time trade-offs in hash coding with allowable errors
Open accessAbstract
In this paper trade-offs among certain computational factors in hash coding are analyzed. The paradigm problem considered is that of testing a series of messages one-by-one for membership in a given set of messages. Two new hash-coding methods are examined and compared with a particular conventional hash-coding method. The computational factors considered are the size of the hash area (space), the time required to identify a message as a nonmember of the given set (reject time), and an allowable error frequency. The new methods are intended to reduce the amount of space required to contain the hash-coded information from that associated with conventional methods. The reduction in space is accomplished by exploiting the possibility that a small fraction of errors of commission may be tolerable in some applications, in particular, applications in which a large amount of data is involved and a core resident hash area is consequently not feasible using conventional methods. In such applications, it is envisaged that overall performance could be improved by using a smaller core resident hash area in conjunction with the new methods and, when necessary, by using some secondary and perhaps time-consuming test to “catch” the small fraction of errors associated with the new methods. An example is discussed which illustrates possible areas of application for the new methods. Analysis of the paradigm problem demonstrates that allowing a small number of test messages to be falsely identified as members of the given set will permit a much smaller hash area to be used without increasing reject time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 10.1145/363744.363776 · doi:10.1145/363744.363776
- 10.1145/362851.362880 · doi:10.1145/362851.362880
- 10.1145/362851.362882 · doi:10.1145/362851.362882
Cited by
RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Response
Erlingsson, Ú., Pihur, V., & Korolova, A. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/2660267.2660348 · Cited by 1,838
Bitcoin and beyond: a technical survey on decentralized digital currencies
Tschorsch, F., & Scheuermann, B. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2535718 · Cited by 1,690
STAMP: Stanford Transactional Applications for Multi-Processing
Minh, C. C., Chung, J., Kozyrakis, C., & Olukotun, K. (2008) · 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization · doi:10.1109/iiswc.2008.4636089 · Cited by 873
Survey of network-based defense mechanisms countering the DoS and DDoS problems
Peng, T., Leckie, C., & Ramamohanarao, K. (2007) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1216370.1216373 · Cited by 759
Cuckoo Filter: Practically Better Than Bloom
Fan, B., Andersen, D. G., Kaminsky, M., & Mitzenmacher, M. D. (2014) · Proceedings of the 10th ACM International on Conference on emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies · doi:10.1145/2674005.2674994 · Cited by 737
Metadata
- Authors
- Bloom, B. H.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 1970-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 422-426
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2123845384
- Cited by
- 7,492
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Space/time trade-offs in hash coding with allowable errors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/362686.362692
- The paper
- Bloom, B. H. (1970). Space/time trade-offs in hash coding with allowable errors. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/362686.362692
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.