Cited by 498Indoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesWireless Networks and Protocols

Properties of indoor received signal strength for WLAN location fingerprinting

Kaemarungsi, K., Krishnamurthy, P.·2004·The First Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services, 2004. MOBIQUITOUS 2004.

Abstract

Indoor positioning systems that make use of received signal strength based location fingerprints and existing wireless local area network infrastructure have recently been the focus for supporting location-based services in indoor and campus areas. A knowledge and understanding of the properties of the location fingerprint can assist in improving design of algorithms and deployment of position location systems. However, most existing research work ignores the radio signal properties. This paper investigates the properties of the received signal strength reported by IEEE 802.11b wireless network interface cards. Analyses of the data are performed to understand the underlying features of location fingerprints. The performance of an indoor positioning system in terms of its precision is compared using measured data and a Gaussian model to see how closely a Gaussian model may fit the measured data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mobiq.2004.1331706

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Indoor positioning in public spaces on transport networks is challenging because radio signals are subject to reflection, diffraction, scattering, attenuation by people, and ambient humidity.

    “Indoor positioning in public spaces on the transport network is a challenge for several reasons: during propagation, the radio signal is subject to reflection, diffraction and scattering due to the architectural elements that exist in that space. To these effects we also have to add signal attenuation due to the presence of people, which may be a mass presence of people in public spaces such as”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaemarungsi, K., & Krishnamurthy, P.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
The First Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services, 2004. MOBIQUITOUS 2004.
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2004-11-08
Pages
14-23
OpenAlex
W2118099695
Cited by
498
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 39
FWCI
8.68
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
EAI International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services (MobiQuitous) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optical Wireless Communication Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Wireless Networks and Protocols
Keywords
received signal strength, location fingerprinting, indoor positioning, wireless LAN, IEEE 802.11b, wireless local area networks, Gaussian model, positioning accuracy, location-based services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review