Cited by 99Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyTraffic control and managementVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems

Cooperative autonomous driving - Intelligent vehicles sharing city roads cooperative autonomous driving

Baber, J., Kolodko, J., Noel, T., Parent, M., Vlacic, L.·2005·IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine

Abstract

The paper presents the Intelligent Control System Laboratory's (ICSL) Cooperative Autonomous Mobile Robot technologies and their application to intelligent vehicles for cities. The deployed decision and control algorithms made the road-scaled vehicles capable of undertaking cooperative autonomous maneuvers. Because the focus of ICSL's research is in decision and control algorithms, it is therefore reasonable to consider replacing or upgrading the sensors used with more recent road sensory concepts as produced by other research groups. While substantial progress has been made, there are still some issues that need to be addressed such as: decision and control algorithms for navigating roundabouts, real-time integration of all data, and decision-making algorithms to enable intelligent vehicles to choose the driving maneuver as they go. With continued research, it is feasible that cooperative autonomous vehicles will coexist alongside human drivers in the not-too-distant future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mra.2005.1411418

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such capability can be achieved through network side support functions built into the TI architecture, as envisioned through the standards work in IEEE 1918.1.

    “Such capability can be achieved through network side support functions built into the TI architecture, as envisioned through the standards work in IEEE 1918.1 [15].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baber, J., Kolodko, J., Noel, T., Parent, M., & Vlacic, L.
Affiliations
  • Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
  • Griffith University (AU)
Venue
IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine
Published
2005-03
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
44-49
ISSN
1070-9932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1625084788
Cited by
99
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Institut national de recherche en informatique et en automatique (INRIA)
  • Australian Academy of Science
  • Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Keywords
cooperative autonomous driving, intelligent vehicles, autonomous mobile robots, urban streets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review