Nudging privacy: The behavioral economics of personal information
Open accessAbstract
Privacy decisions often involve balancing competing interests. As such, they're a natural field of study for economics. But traditional economic models have made overly restrictive assumptions about the stability and nature of individual privacy preferences. Approaches drawing on existing research in behavioral economics and psychology can offer complementary tools for understanding privacy decision making.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Decisions to disclose data can be based on a trade-off where individuals choose to exchange their private data for benefits or services that they consider important.
“suggest that decisions to disclose data can be based on a trade-off where individuals choose to exchange their private data for benefits or services that they consider important (e.g., Hann et al., 2002;Hui et al., 2007;Acquisti, 2009).”
From The privacy and control paradoxes in the context of smartphone apps (2022) · cites this paper as Acquisti, 2009
Cites
Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust: An Empirical Investigation
Culnan, M. J., & Armstrong, P. K. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.1.104 · Cited by 1,870 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kehr, F., Kowatsch, T., Wentzel, D., & Fleisch, E. (2015) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12062 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
The right to be forgotten in the light of the consent of the data subject
Bartolini, C., & Siry, L. (2016) · Computer Law & Security Review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2016.01.005 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
The privacy and control paradoxes in the context of smartphone apps
Ayres-Pereira, V., Pirrone, A., Korbmacher, M., Tjostheim, I., & Böhm, G. (2022) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2022.986138 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Acquisti, A.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Acquisti, Alessandro
- ORCID
- Acquisti, Alessandro
- Venue
- IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 82-85
- ISSN
- 1540-7993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993938397
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 26.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- IEEE Security & Privacy (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Keywords
- privacy decisions, nudging, behavioral economics, personal data, privacy preferences, privacy trade-offs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review