The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reproducible research in signal processing
Open accessAbstract
What should we do to raise the quality of signal processing publications to an even higher level? We believe it to be crucial to maintain the precision in describing our work in publications, ensured through a high-quality reviewing process. We also believe that if the experiments are performed on a large data set, the algorithm is compared to the state-of-the-art methods, the code and/or data are well documented and available online, we will all benefit and make it easier to build upon each other's work. It is a clear win-win situation for our community: we will have access to more and more algorithms and can spend time inventing new things rather than recreating existing ones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate
Piwowar, H. A., Day, R. S., & Fridsma, D. B. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000308 · Cited by 881
Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact
Lawrence, S. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35079151 · Cited by 797
Pearson, H. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/434952a · Cited by 67
Cited by
Icy: an open bioimage informatics platform for extended reproducible research
de Chaumont, F., Dallongeville, S., Chenouard, N., Hervé, N., Pop, S., Provoost, T., Meas-Yedid, V., Pankajakshan, P., Lecomte, T., Le Montagner, Y., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2075 · Cited by 1,538
Dohler, M., Heath, R. W., Lozano, A., Papadias, C. B., & Valenzuela, R. A. (2011) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2011.5741160 · Cited by 221
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Dobránszki, J. (2015) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2014.899909 · Cited by 158
ReproZip: Computational Reproducibility With Ease
Chirigati, F., Rampin, R., Shasha, D., & Freire, J. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management of Data · doi:10.1145/2882903.2899401 · Cited by 128
Liu, D. M., & Salganik, M. J. (2019) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/2378023119849803 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Vandewalle, P., Kovacevic, J., & Vetterli, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 37-47
- ISSN
- 1053-5888 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0792
- OpenAlex
- W2139210474
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 54.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproducible research in signal processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/msp.2009.932122
- The paper
- Vandewalle, P., Kovacevic, J., & Vetterli, M. (2009). Reproducible research in signal processing. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/msp.2009.932122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
