Cited by 8Optimal Power Flow DistributionThermal Analysis in Power TransmissionElectric Power System Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fast Hosting Capacity Analysis for Thermal Loading Constraint Using Sensitivity-based Decomposition Method

Abstract

High solar photovoltaic (PV) penetration can cause reverse power flows that exceed the thermal loading limits of distribution transformers, lines, and other equipment. PV hosting capacity refers to the amount of solar PV that a feeder location can accommodate without adverse power quality, reliability, or safety impacts. Previous work has established that the nodal voltage magnitude has a quasi-linear relationship with the feeder load and PV power injections. However, the analysis of circuit thermal limits in hosting capacity is more difficult due to the nonlinear nature of the line current magnitude. This paper uses a decomposition method that combines real and reactive power flow manifolds to accurately estimate the branch current magnitude and consequently, the thermal hosting capacity. The method requires solving only a small number of nonlinear AC power flows and has the potential to significantly speed up PV hosting capacity analysis. The accuracy of the proposed method is evaluated on the IEEE 123 bus test circuit.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/naps50074.2021.9449771

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 10.1109/PVSC.2017.8366414 · DOI
  2. qureshi, 2018, A Fast Scalable Quasi-Static Time Series Analysis Method for PV Impact Studies using Linear Sensitivity Model, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy
  3. qureshi, 0, Fast Hosting Capacity Analysis Considering Over-Voltage Criteria and Impact of Regulating Devices, (To appear) IEEE PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition
  4. 10.1109/PVSC.2018.8547439 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 0, IEEE PES Distribution Test Feeders
  6. 10.1109/PESGM40551.2019.8973900 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1109/PVSC.2018.8547693 · DOI · Paper page
  8. smith, 2016, Defining a roadmap for successful implementation of a hosting capacity method for New York State

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Qureshi, M. U., Kumar, A., Grijalva, S., Deboever, J., Peppanen, J., & Rylander, M.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Electric Power Research Institute (US)
Venue
2020 52nd North American Power Symposium (NAPS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-04-11
Pages
1-5
OpenAlex
W3176231647
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.75
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
North American Power Symposium (NAPS) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
Keywords
photovoltaic hosting capacity, distribution feeders, reverse power flow, photovoltaic penetration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review