Cited by 39Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityBlockchain Technology in Education and LearningUser Authentication and Security Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Integration Architecture to Enable Service Providers for Self-sovereign Identity

Gruner, Andreas, Muhle, Alexander, Meinel, Christoph·2019·2019 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA)

Abstract

The self-sovereign identity management model emerged with the rise of blockchain technology. This paradigm focuses on user-centricity and strives to place the user in full control of the digital identity. Numerous implementations embrace the self-sovereign identity concept, leading to a fragmented landscape of solutions. At the same time, traditional identity and access management protocols are largely disregarded and facilities to issue verifiable claims as attributes are not available. Therefore, service providers barely adopt these solutions. We propose a component-based architecture for integrating self-sovereign identity solutions into web applications to foster their adoption by service providers. Furthermore, we outline a sample implementation as a gateway that enables uPort and Jolocom for authentication, via the OpenID Connect protocol, as well as the retrieval of email address attestations for these solutions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/nca.2019.8935015

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some solutions rely on gateways that can introduce centralization to a certain extent.

    “Some solutions rely on gateways that can introduce centralization to a certain extent [46][47]”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 7 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 0, Did auth Scope formats and protocols
  2. 0, Openid Connect Core 1 0
  3. 0, Universal Resolver
  4. 0, Awesome decentralized identity self-sovereign blockchain and decentralized identity resources
  5. allen, 0, The Path to Self-Sovereign Identity
  6. reed, 0, The Technical Foundations of Sovrin A White Paper From the Sovrin Foundation
  7. ali, 0, Blockstack: A global naming and storage system secured by blockchains, Proceedings of the 2016 USENIX Annual Technical Conference
  8. 0, Jolocom whitepaper, self-sovereign and decentralised identity by design
  9. lundkvist, 0, Uport a Platform for Self-Sovereign Identity
  10. meinel, 2018, Blockchain Hype oder innovation
  11. reed, 0, Decentralized identifiers (DIDs) Data model and syntaxes for decentralized identifiers (DIDs)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gruner, A., Muhle, A., & Meinel, C.
Affiliations
Hasso Plattner Institute (DE)
Venue
2019 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-09
Pages
1-5
OpenAlex
W2995800970
Cited by
39
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.19
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
Keywords
self-sovereign identity, identity management, component-based architecture, OpenID Connect, blockchain-based identity, web application integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review