Cited by 22Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchVoice and Speech DisordersSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

Classifying Speech of ASD Affected and Normal Children Using Acoustic Features

Mohanta, Abhijit, Mittal, Vinay Kumar·2020·2020 National Conference on Communications (NCC)

Abstract

Children affected with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) produce speech that consists of distinctive acoustic patterns, as compared to normal children. Hence, acoustic analyses can help classifying speech of ASD affected children from that of normal children. In this study, the aim is to identify those discriminating characteristics of speech production that help classification between speech of children with ASD and normal children. Two separate datasets were recorded for this study: the English speech of children affected with ASD and the English speech of normal children. Comparative analyses of acoustic features derived for both datasets are carried out. Changes in the speech production characteristics are examined in three parts. Firstly, changes in the excitation source features F0 and strength of excitation (SoE) are analyzed. Secondly, changes in the vocal tract filter features the formants (F1 to F5) and dominant frequencies (FD1, FD2) are analyzed. Thirdly, changes in the combined source-filter features signal energy and zero-crossing rate are analyzed. Different combinations of the feature sets are then classified using three different classifiers for validation of results: SVM, KNN and ensemble classifiers. Performance evaluation is carried using different combinations of features sets and classifiers. Results up to 97.1% are obtained for classification accuracy between speech of ASD affected children and normal children, using a combination of feature set with SVM classifier. The results are better than other similar few studies. This study should be helpful in developing an automated system for identffying ASD speech, in future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ncc48643.2020.9056084

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Midjourney was selected as a research probe due to its customization and easy-to-use features and its speed and efficiency in generating diverse high-quality images without prolonged prompt setup.

    “In addition to physical expressive materials, we introduced one of the most popular image-generative AI tools, Midjourney [74], as a research probe due to several advantages: (1) customization and easy-to-use: it provides a broad range of customization features and a highly user-friendly interface [88]. (2) speed and efficiency: it quickly generates diverse high-quality images without prolonged p”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mohanta, A., & Mittal, V. K.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Information Technology Sri City (IN)
  • Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation (IN)
Venue
2020 National Conference on Communications (NCC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-02
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W3015641485
Cited by
22
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.91
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
National Conference on Communications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, speech classification, acoustic features, fundamental frequency, excitation strength, formants, dominant frequency, zero-crossing rate, support vector machine, ensemble classifiers, children's speech

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review