The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Software Defined Networking architecture for the Internet-of-Things
Abstract
The growing interest in the Internet of Things (IoT) has resulted in a number of wide-area deployments of IoT subnetworks, where multiple heterogeneous wireless communication solutions coexist: from multiple access technologies such as cellular, WiFi, ZigBee, and Bluetooth, to multi-hop ad-hoc and MANET routing protocols, they all must be effectively integrated to create a seamless communication platform. Managing these open, geographically distributed, and heterogeneous networking infrastructures, especially in dynamic environments, is a key technical challenge. In order to take full advantage of the many opportunities they provide, techniques to concurrently provision the different classes of IoT traffic across a common set of sensors and networking resources must be designed. In this paper, we will design a software-defined approach for the IoT environment to dynamically achieve differentiated quality levels to different IoT tasks in very heterogeneous wireless networking scenarios. For this, we extend the Multinetwork INformation Architecture (MINA), a reflective (self-observing and adapting via an embodied Observe-Analyze-Adapt loop) middleware with a layered IoT SDN controller. The developed IoT SDN controller originally i) incorporates and supports commands to differentiate flow scheduling over task-level, multi-hop, and heterogeneous ad-hoc paths and ii) exploits Network Calculus and Genetic Algorithms to optimize the usage of currently available IoT network opportunities. We have applied the extended MINA SDN prototype in the challenging IoT scenario of wide-scale integration of electric vehicles, electric charging sites, smart grid infrastructures, and a wide set of pilot users, as targeted by the Artemis Internet of Energy and Arrowhead projects. Preliminary simulation performance results indicate that our approach and the extended MINA system can support efficient exploitation of the IoT multinetwork capabilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McKeown (2008) · doi:10.1145/1355734.1355746 · Cited by 8,513
Fundamentals of Queueing Theory.
Moore, R. H., Gross, D., & Harris, C. M. (1977) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2286953 · Cited by 2,930
A Survey of Software-Defined Networking: Past, Present, and Future of Programmable Networks
Nunes, B. A. A., Mendonca, M., Nguyen, X.-N., Obraczka, K., & Turletti, T. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2014.012214.00180 · Cited by 2,203
Quality-of-service routing for supporting multimedia applications
Wang, Z., & Crowcroft, J. (1996) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/49.536364 · Cited by 1,626
Network Calculus: A Theory of Deterministic Queuing Systems for the Internet
Boudec, J. L., & Thiran, P. (2001) · Cited by 1,593
Hedera: dynamic flow scheduling for data center networks
Al-Fares, M., Radhakrishnan, S., Raghavan, B., Huang, N., & Vahdat, A. M. (2010) · doi:10.5555/1855711.1855730 · Cited by 1,450
Fundamentals of Queueing Theory
Gross, D., Shortle, J., Thompson, J. M., & Harris, C. M. (2008) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118625651 · Cited by 1,123
DevoFlow: scaling flow management for high-performance networks
Curtis, A. R., Mogul, J. C., Tourrilhes, J., Yalagandula, P., Sharma, P., & Banerjee, S. (2011) · Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2011 conference · doi:10.1145/2018436.2018466 · Cited by 959
Sensor OpenFlow: Enabling Software-Defined Wireless Sensor Networks
Luo, T., Tan, H.-P., & Quek, T. Q. S. (2012) · IEEE Communications Letters · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2012.092812.121712 · Cited by 491
Toward Software-Defined Cellular Networks
Li, L. E., Mao, Z. M., & Rexford, J. (2012) · 2012 European Workshop on Software Defined Networking · doi:10.1109/ewsdn.2012.28 · Cited by 350
Cited by
Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications
Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2444095 · Cited by 8,630
Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey
Kreutz, D., Ramos, F. M. V., Esteves Verissimo, P., Esteve Rothenberg, C., Azodolmolky, S., & Uhlig, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2014.2371999 · Cited by 5,050
Internet of Things (IoT): A review of enabling technologies, challenges, and open research issues
Čolaković, A., & Hadžialić, M. (2018) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2018.07.017 · Cited by 825
Interoperability in Internet of Things: Taxonomies and Open Challenges
Noura, M., Atiquzzaman, M., & Gaedke, M. (2019) · Mobile Networks and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11036-018-1089-9 · Cited by 693
Internet of Things Architecture: Recent Advances, Taxonomy, Requirements, and Open Challenges
Yaqoob, I., Ahmed, E., Hashem, I. A. T., Ahmed, A. I. A., Gani, A., Imran, M., & Guizani, M. (2017) · IEEE Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/mwc.2017.1600421 · Cited by 668
Metadata
- Authors
- Qin, Z., Denker, G., Giannelli, C., Bellavista, P., & Venkatasubramanian, N.
- Venue
- 2014 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2014-05
- Pages
- 1-9
- OpenAlex
- W2115377324
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 31.53
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Software Defined Networking architecture for the Internet-of-Things. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/noms.2014.6838365
- The paper
- Qin, Z., Denker, G., Giannelli, C., Bellavista, P., & Venkatasubramanian, N. (2014). A Software Defined Networking architecture for the Internet-of-Things. 2014 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS). https://doi.org/10.1109/noms.2014.6838365
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.