The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Data analysis and robust modelling of the impact of renewable generation on long term security of supply and demand
Open accessAbstract
This paper studies rigorous statistical techniques for modelling long term reliability of demand and supply of electrical power given uncertain variability in the generation and availability of wind power and conventional generation. In doing so, we take care to validate statistical assumptions, using historical observations, as well as our intuition about the actual underlying real-world statistical process. Where assumptions could not be easily validated, we say so explicitly. In particular, we aim to improve existing statistical models through sensitivity analysis of ill-known parameters: we propose models for wind power and conventional generation, estimate their parameters from historical wind power data and conventional availability data, and finally combine them with historical demand data to build a full robust joint time-dependent model of energy not served. Bounds on some useful indices from this model are then calculated, such as expected energy not served, and expected number of continuous outage periods-the latter cannot be estimated from a purely time collapsed model because time collapsed models necessarily do not model correlations across time. We compare our careful model with a naive model that ignores deviations from normality, and find that this results in substantial differences: in this specific study, the naive model overestimates the risk roughly by a factor 2. This justifies the care and caution by which model assumptions must be verified, and the effort that must be taken to adapt the model accordingly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Practical markov chain monte carlo
Geyer, C. J. (1992) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177011137 · Cited by 2,045
Cited by
Stochastic Energy Scheduling in Microgrids With Intermittent Renewable Energy Resources
Su, W., Wang, J., & Roh, J. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2013.2280645 · Cited by 734
Smart meters for power grid: Challenges, issues, advantages and status
Depuru, S. S. S. R., Wang, L., & Devabhaktuni, V. (2011) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.039 · Cited by 567
Habib, S., Kamran, M., & Rashid, U. (2015) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.020 · Cited by 556
Wang, Q., Zhang, C., Ding, Y., Xydis, G., Wang, J., & Østergaard, J. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.048 · Cited by 379
Microgrid management system based on a multi-agent approach: An office building pilot
Gomes, L., Vale, Z., & Corchado, J. M. (2020) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107427 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Troffaes, M. C. M., Williams, E., & Dent, C.
- Venue
- 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-07
- Pages
- 1-5
- OpenAlex
- W1838220136
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 45.44
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Data analysis and robust modelling of the impact of renewable generation on long term security of supply and demand. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/pesgm.2015.7286070
- The paper
- Troffaes, M. C. M., Williams, E., & Dent, C. (2015). Data analysis and robust modelling of the impact of renewable generation on long term security of supply and demand. 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting. https://doi.org/10.1109/pesgm.2015.7286070
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.