The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A subjective model for trustworthiness evaluation in the social Internet of Things
Open accessAbstract
The integration of social networking concepts into the Internet of Things (IoT) has led to the so called Social Internet of Things (SIoT) paradigm, according to which the objects are capable of establishing social relationships in an autonomous way with respect to their owners. The benefits are those of improving scalability in information/service discovery when the SIoT is made of huge numbers of heterogeneous nodes, similarly to what happens with social networks among humans. In this paper we focus on the problem of understanding how the information provided by the other members of the SIoT has to be processed so as to build a reliable system on the basis of the behavior of the objects. We define a subjective model for the management of trustworthiness which builds upon the solutions proposed for P2P networks. Each node computes the trustworthiness of its friends on the basis of its own experience and on the opinion of the common friends with the potential service providers. We employ a feedback system and we combine the credibility and centrality of the nodes to evaluate the trust level. Preliminary simulations show the benefits of the proposed model towards the isolation of almost any malicious node in the network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Resnick, P., Kuwabara, K., Zeckhauser, R., & Friedman, E. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/355112.355122 · Cited by 2,190
Cited by
A survey on trust management for Internet of Things
Yan, Z., Zhang, P., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2014) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2014.01.014 · Cited by 1,155
Internet of Things: Security vulnerabilities and challenges
Andrea, I., Chrysostomou, C., & Hadjichristofi, G. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communication (ISCC) · doi:10.1109/iscc.2015.7405513 · Cited by 520
Trustworthiness Management in the Social Internet of Things
Nitti, M., Girau, R., & Atzori, L. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2013.105 · Cited by 508
Self-citationPizzi, S., Suraci, C., Iera, A., Molinaro, A., & Araniti, G. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting · doi:10.1109/tbc.2020.2977512 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nitti, M., Girau, R., Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G.
- Venue
- 2012 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications - (PIMRC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2012-09
- Pages
- 18-23
- OpenAlex
- W2030560149
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.18
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A subjective model for trustworthiness evaluation in the social Internet of Things. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/pimrc.2012.6362662
- The paper
- Nitti, M., Girau, R., Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2012). A subjective model for trustworthiness evaluation in the social Internet of Things. 2012 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications - (PIMRC). https://doi.org/10.1109/pimrc.2012.6362662
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.