An API Development Model for Digital Twins
Abstract
Digital twins are software implementations of their physical counterparts. These software representations act through application program interfaces (APIs) to the physical devices they monitor, engage with and possibly control. Here a development model is proposed to ensure the desired reliability and performance of the API which is critical to the overall success of the Digital Twin.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In order to fully exploit the DT it is important to have DT's Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) and models for programming the objects.
“In order to fully exploit the DT it is important to have DT's Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) [23], and models for programming the objects [24].”
From Digital Twin in the IoT Context: A Survey on Technical Features, Scenarios, and Architectural Models (2020) · cites this paper as [23]
The properties of the DT, augmentation and memorization, offer the possibility to standardize the APIs of DT and to promote its programmability.
“The properties of the DT, augmentation and memorization, actually offer the possibility to standardize the APIs of DT, as proposed in [23], and to promote its programmability [243][244].”
From Digital Twin in the IoT Context: A Survey on Technical Features, Scenarios, and Architectural Models (2020) · cites this paper as [23]
Cites
Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems
Grieves, M., & Vickers, J. (2017) · Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4 · Cited by 3,727 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital Twin in the IoT Context: A Survey on Technical Features, Scenarios, and Architectural Models
Minerva, R., Lee, G. M., & Crespi, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2020.2998530 · Cited by 812 · see citing works
- Authors
- Scheibmeir, J., & Malaiya, Y.
- Affiliations
- Colorado State University (US)
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-07
- Pages
- 518-519
- OpenAlex
- W2979766002
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
- Keywords
- digital twin, application programming interfaces, software reliability, API performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
