The DOI matches its Crossref record; 172 of the 172 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review of Eye Tracking Metrics Involved in Emotional and Cognitive Processes
Abstract
Eye behaviour provides valuable information revealing one's higher cognitive functions and state of affect. Although eye tracking is gaining ground in the research community, it is not yet a popular approach for the detection of emotional and cognitive states. In this paper, we present a review of eye and pupil tracking related metrics (such as gaze, fixations, saccades, blinks, pupil size variation, etc.) utilized towards the detection of emotional and cognitive processes, focusing on visual attention, emotional arousal and cognitive workload. Besides, we investigate their involvement as well as the computational recognition methods employed for the reliable emotional and cognitive assessment. The publicly available datasets employed in relevant research efforts were collected and their specifications and other pertinent details are described. The multimodal approaches which combine eye-tracking features with other modalities (e.g. biosignals), along with artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques were also surveyed in terms of their recognition/classification accuracy. The limitations, current open research problems and prospective future research directions were discussed for the usage of eye-tracking as the primary sensor modality. This study aims to comprehensively present the most robust and significant eye/pupil metrics based on available literature towards the development of a robust emotional or cognitive computational model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334 · cited 3×
“There are various dimensional models of affect, the most known of which is the circumplex model of Russell [5], which maps emotions along predefined axes.”
BackgroundInfluentialCognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design
Sweller, J. (1994) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5 · Cited by 3,801 · cited 1×
“According to cognitive load theory, there are three types of cognitive load: 1) intrinsic load 2) extraneous load and 3) germane load [16].”
BackgroundLearning to predict where humans look
Judd, T., Ehinger, K., Durand, F., & Torralba, A. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2009.5459462 · Cited by 2,016
The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation
Bradley, M. M., Miccoli, L., Escrig, M. A., & Lang, P. J. (2008) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00654.x · Cited by 1,919
What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?
Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1411 · Cited by 1,766 · cited 1×
“Some attributes or regions of the stimuli are more probable to attract the observer’s covert or overt attention, making them salient, such as distinctive color, motion, orientation, or size [79].”
BackgroundGraph-based approach for airborne light detection and ranging segmentation
Vilariño, D. L., Cabaleiro, J. C., Martínez, J., Rivera, F. F., & Pena, T. F. (2017) · Journal of Applied Remote Sensing · doi:10.1117/1.jrs.11.015020 · Cited by 1,721
Emotions Revealed: Recognizing Faces and Feelings to Improve Communication and Emotional Life
Ekman, P. (2003) · Cited by 1,598
Eye Tracking in Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Research
Jacob, R. J. K., & Karn, K. S. (2003) · The Mind's Eye · doi:10.1016/b978-044451020-4/50031-1 · Cited by 1,567
In the Eye of the Beholder: A Survey of Models for Eyes and Gaze
Hansen, D. W., & Ji, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.30 · Cited by 1,546
Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention
Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2003) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00084-1 · Cited by 1,390
Cited by
Eye tracking technology for examining cognitive processes in education: a systematic review
Liu, X., & Cui, Y. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105263 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Skaramagkas, V., Giannakakis, G., Ktistakis, E., Manousos, D., Karatzanis, I., Tachos, N., Tripoliti, E., Marias, K., Fotiadis, D. I., & Tsiknakis, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 16
- Pages
- 260-277
- ISSN
- 1937-3333 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-1189
- OpenAlex
- W3137529719
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 172
- FWCI
- 26.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of Eye Tracking Metrics Involved in Emotional and Cognitive Processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/rbme.2021.3066072
- The paper
- Skaramagkas, V., Giannakakis, G., Ktistakis, E., Manousos, D., Karatzanis, I., Tachos, N., Tripoliti, E., Marias, K., Fotiadis, D. I., & Tsiknakis, M. (2023). Review of Eye Tracking Metrics Involved in Emotional and Cognitive Processes. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/rbme.2021.3066072
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.