Cited by 31Soft Robotics and ApplicationsProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsAdvanced Materials and Mechanics

A Novel Soft Glove for Hand Tremor Suppression: Evaluation of Layer Jamming Actuator Placement

Awantha, W.V.I., Wanasinghe, A.T., Kavindya, A.G.P., Kulasekera, A.L., Chathuranga, D.S.·2020·2020 3rd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft)

Abstract

The following paper presents the concept of a layer jamming based soft glove for hand tremor suppression, its implementation, validation of the soft glove for hand tremor suppression and evaluation of the effect of layer jamming actuator placement. Wearable tremor suppression devices can avoid the side effects which occur due to available medical treatments, but contemporary methods are bulky and negatively affects the voluntary motions of the hand. Hence, a soft tremor suppression device can be developed to overcome the issues faced in contemporary wearable devices. A hand tremor suppression device using layer jamming was proposed in the study. In this study, experimentation for the material selection for layer jamming elements, evaluation of the layer jamming element placement and validation of the soft glove were conducted to characterize and evaluate the performance of the soft glove. Layer jamming material selection was done by measuring the deflection against an applied load. The performance of the soft glove was evaluated by measuring the suppression of a simulated tremor for the dorsal and palmar configurations. Performance evaluation shows a maximum tremor reduction of 78.32% in the palmar side element configuration in comparison to 38.23% in the dorsal side. Performance evaluation shows promising results in the suppression of hand tremors using the proposed soft glove and the results suggest that the palmar side element configuration can achieve higher tremor reduction comparatively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/robosoft48309.2020.9115994

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The jamming-actuator soft glove yielded an amplitude reduction of 74.79 ± 4.23% for the palmar-side actuator placement.

    “The maximum tremor reduction was obtained for the placement of the actuator in the palmar side, and it yielded to an amplitude reduction of 74.79 ± 4.23%.”

    From A Review on Wearable Technologies for Tremor Suppression (2021) · cites this paper as [62]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Awantha, W. V. I., Wanasinghe, A. T., Kavindya, A. G. P., Kulasekera, A. L., & Chathuranga, D. S.
Affiliations
University of Moratuwa (LK)
Venue
2020 3rd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-05
Pages
440-445
OpenAlex
W3035977414
Cited by
31
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
9.53
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
Keywords
layer jamming, wearable devices, actuator placement, tremor suppression, soft robotics, material selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review