Cited by 21Image and Signal Denoising MethodsImage Enhancement TechniquesImage and Video Stabilization

Removal of adherent noises from image sequences by spatio-temporal image processing

Yamashita, Atsushi, Fukuchi, Isao, Kaneko, Toru, Miura, Kenjiro T.·2008·2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

Abstract

This paper describes a method for removing adherent noises from image sequences. In outdoor environments, it is often the case that scenes taken by a camera are deteriorated because of adherent noises such as waterdrops on the surface of the lens-protecting glass of the camera. To solve this problem, our method takes advantage of image sequences captured with a moving camera. The method makes a spatio-temporal image to extract the regions of adherent noises by examining differences of track slopes in cross section images between adherent noises and other objects. Finally, regions of noises are eliminated by replacing with image data corresponding to object regions. Experimental results show the effectiveness of our method.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/robot.2008.4543570

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The spatio-temporal algorithm requires collecting and post-processing a sequence of image frames over time, which makes it not appropriate for real-time automotive applications.

    “This algorithm requires collecting and post-processing a sequence of image frames over time which makes it not appropriate for real-time automotive applications.”
  • Yamashita et al.'s spatio-temporal algorithm detection results were comparable to those conducted by a human observer.

    “Detection results with this algorithm were comparable to those conducted by a human observer.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yamashita, A., Fukuchi, I., Kaneko, T., & Miura, K. T.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Shizuoka University (JP)
Venue
2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2008-05
Pages
2386-2391
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146032989
Cited by
21
References
24
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.33
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Stabilization
Keywords
image sequences, moving camera, cross-section images

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review