Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 224

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison of basic converter topologies for power factor correction

Open access
Huai Wei, Batarseh, I.·2002·Proceedings IEEE Southeastcon '98 'Engineering for a New Era'

Abstract

Basic types of DC-DC converters, when operating in discontinuous conduction mode, have self power factor correction (PFC) property, that is, if these converters are connected to the rectified AC line, they have the capability to give higher power factor by the nature of their topologies. Input current feedback is unnecessary when these converters are employed to improve power factor. In this paper, basic types of DC-DC converter topologies are studied to investigate their self-PFC capabilities. Their input characteristics are compared and their input line current waveforms are predicted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/secon.1998.673368

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 224

Metadata

Authors
Wei, H., & Batarseh, I.
Venue
Proceedings IEEE Southeastcon '98 'Engineering for a New Era'
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2002-11-27
Pages
348-353
ISSN
1091-0050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169061225
Cited by
224
References
0
FWCI
6.05
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of basic converter topologies for power factor correction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/secon.1998.673368
The paper
Wei, H., & Batarseh, I. (2002). Comparison of basic converter topologies for power factor correction. Proceedings IEEE Southeastcon '98 'Engineering for a New Era'. https://doi.org/10.1109/secon.1998.673368

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.