Proceedings 2002 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy

·2002

DOI 10.1109/secpri.2002

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/secpri.2002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Privacy-preserving data publishing: A survey of recent developments
Fung, B. C. M., Wang, K., Chen, R., & Yu, P. S. (2010) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1749603.1749605 · Cited by 1,704
A survey on automated dynamic malware-analysis techniques and tools
Egele, M., Scholte, T., Kirda, E., & Kruegel, C. (2012) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2089125.2089126 · Cited by 871
A survey on fake news and rumour detection techniques
Bondielli, A., & Marcelloni, F. (2019) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2019.05.035 · Cited by 658
A Comprehensive Survey of Privacy-preserving Federated Learning: A Taxonomy, Review, and Future Directions
Yin, X., Zhu, Y., & Hu, J. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3460427 · Cited by 638
Demystifying Arm TrustZone: A Comprehensive Survey
Pinto, S., & Santos, N. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3291047 · Cited by 505
Security in embedded systems: Design challenges
Ravi, S., Raghunathan, A., Kocher, P., & Hattangady, S. (2004) · ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1015047.1015049 · Cited by 463
Optimization problems for machine learning: A survey
Gambella, C., Ghaddar, B., & Naoum-Sawaya, J. (2021) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.045 · Cited by 365
Predicting personality from patterns of behavior collected with smartphones
Stachl, C., Au, Q., Schoedel, R., Gosling, S. D., Harari, G. M., Buschek, D., Völkel, S. T., Schuwerk, T., Oldemeier, M., Ullmann, T., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1920484117 · Cited by 348
A survey of edge computing-based designs for IoT security
Sha, K., Yang, T. A., Wei, W., & Davari, S. (2020) · Digital Communications and Networks · doi:10.1016/j.dcan.2019.08.006 · Cited by 295
The Role of Machine Learning in Cybersecurity
Apruzzese, G., Laskov, P., Montes de Oca, E., Mallouli, W., Brdalo Rapa, L., Grammatopoulos, A. V., & Di Franco, F. (2023) · Digital Threats: Research and Practice · doi:10.1145/3545574 · Cited by 279
Smart contracts on the blockchain – A bibliometric analysis and review
Ante, L. (2021) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2020.101519 · Cited by 267
Systematically Understanding the Cyber Attack Business: A Survey
Huang, K., Siegel, M., & Madnick, S. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3199674 · Cited by 112
Proactive vs. reactive personalization: Can customization of privacy enhance user experience?
Zhang, B., & Sundar, S. S. (2019) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.03.002 · Cited by 109
Security policies
Anderson, R., Stajano, F., & Lee, J.-H. (2002) · Advances in Computers · doi:10.1016/s0065-2458(01)80030-9 · Cited by 11
A large-scale analysis of Wi-Fi passwords
Veroni, E., Ntantogian, C., & Xenakis, C. (2022) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2022.103190 · Cited by 7

Publisher: IEEE
Published: 2002
DOI: 10.1109/secpri.2002
OpenAlex: W4298134634
Cited by: 374
References: 0
Type: paratext
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review