Polynomial simulations of decohered quantum computers
Abstract
Recently it has become clear, that a key issue in quantum computation is understanding how interaction with the environment, or "decoherence", affects the computational power of quantum computers. We adopt the standard physical method of describing systems which are interwound with their environment by "density matrices", and within this framework define a model of decoherence in quantum computation. Our results show that the computational power of decohered quantum computers depends strongly on the amount of parallelism in the computation. We first present a simulation of decohered sequential quantum computers, on a classical probabilistic Turing machine, and prove that the expected slowdown of this simulation is polynomial in time and space of the quantum computation, for any non zero decoherence rate. Similar results hold for quantum computers that are allowed to operate on logarithmic number of qubits at a time. For decohered quantum circuits (with local gates), the situation is more subtle and depends on the decoherence rate, /spl eta/. We find that our simulation is efficient for circuits with decoherence rate /spl eta/ higher than some constant /spl eta//sub 1/ but exponential for a general (random) circuit subjected to decoherence rate lower than some constant /spl eta//sub 2/. The transition from exponential cost to polynomial cost happens in a short range of decoherence rates. We use computer experiments to exhibit the phase transitions in various quantum circuits.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Under the restriction that all qubits are initialized at time 0, it is impossible to compute fault-tolerantly without an exponential blowup in the size of the circuit.
“Without this assumption, i.e. under the restriction that all qubits are initialized at time 0, it is impossible to compute fault tolerantly without an exponential blowup in the size of the circuit[5].”
From Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Constant Error Rate (2008) · cites this paper as [5]
Cites
Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer
Deutsch, D. (1985) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1985.0070 · Cited by 4,597 · see citing works
Elementary gates for quantum computation
Barenco, A., Bennett, C. H., Cleve, R., DiVincenzo, D. P., Margolus, N., Shor, P., Sleator, T., Smolin, J. A., & Weinfurter, H. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.3457 · Cited by 4,311 · see citing works
Good quantum error-correcting codes exist
Calderbank, A. R., & Shor, P. W. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.1098 · Cited by 2,516 · see citing works
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.255 · Cited by 1,651 · see citing works
Bernstein, E., & Vazirani, U. (1993) · Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '93 · doi:10.1145/167088.167097 · Cited by 1,284 · see citing works
Quantum computers and dissipation
(1996) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1996.0029 · Cited by 899 · see citing works
Quantum Computers, Factoring, and Decoherence
Chuang, I. L., Laflamme, R., Shor, P. W., & Zurek, W. H. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5242.1633 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fault-tolerant quantum computation with constant error
Aharonov, D., & Ben-Or, M. (1997) · Proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '97 · doi:10.1145/258533.258579 · Cited by 631 · see citing works
Self-citationComputational advantage of quantum random sampling
Hangleiter, D., & Eisert, J. (2023) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.95.035001 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
- Authors
- Aharonov, D., & Ben-Or, M.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Venue
- Proceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc. Press
- Published
- 2002-12-23
- Pages
- 46-55
- ISSN
- 0272-5428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137373135
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (publishedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- decoherence, quantum computing hardware, computational power, density matrix, classical simulation of quantum computation, probabilistic Turing machines, quantum circuits, decoherence rate, parallelism, phase transitions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review