Cited by 41Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Polynomial simulations of decohered quantum computers

Aharonov, D., Ben-Or, M.·2002·Proceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science

Abstract

Recently it has become clear, that a key issue in quantum computation is understanding how interaction with the environment, or "decoherence", affects the computational power of quantum computers. We adopt the standard physical method of describing systems which are interwound with their environment by "density matrices", and within this framework define a model of decoherence in quantum computation. Our results show that the computational power of decohered quantum computers depends strongly on the amount of parallelism in the computation. We first present a simulation of decohered sequential quantum computers, on a classical probabilistic Turing machine, and prove that the expected slowdown of this simulation is polynomial in time and space of the quantum computation, for any non zero decoherence rate. Similar results hold for quantum computers that are allowed to operate on logarithmic number of qubits at a time. For decohered quantum circuits (with local gates), the situation is more subtle and depends on the decoherence rate, /spl eta/. We find that our simulation is efficient for circuits with decoherence rate /spl eta/ higher than some constant /spl eta//sub 1/ but exponential for a general (random) circuit subjected to decoherence rate lower than some constant /spl eta//sub 2/. The transition from exponential cost to polynomial cost happens in a short range of decoherence rates. We use computer experiments to exhibit the phase transitions in various quantum circuits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/sfcs.1996.548463

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Under the restriction that all qubits are initialized at time 0, it is impossible to compute fault-tolerantly without an exponential blowup in the size of the circuit.

    “Without this assumption, i.e. under the restriction that all qubits are initialized at time 0, it is impossible to compute fault tolerantly without an exponential blowup in the size of the circuit[5].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aharonov, D., & Ben-Or, M.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Venue
Proceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science
Published
2002-12-23
Pages
46-55
ISSN
0272-5428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137373135
Cited by
41
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.98
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (publishedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
decoherence, quantum computing hardware, computational power, density matrix, classical simulation of quantum computation, probabilistic Turing machines, quantum circuits, decoherence rate, parallelism, phase transitions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review