The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pseudorandom functions revisited: the cascade construction and its concrete security
Abstract
Pseudorandom function families are a powerful cryptographic primitive, yielding, in particular simple solutions for the main problems in private key cryptography. Their existence based on general assumptions (namely the existence of one-way functions) has been established. The authors investigate new ways of designing pseudorandom function families. The goal is to find constructions that are both efficient and secure, and thus eventually to bring the benefits of pseudorandom functions to practice. The basic building blocks in the design are certain limited versions of pseudorandom function families, called finite length input pseudorandom function families, for which very efficient realizations exist impractical cryptography. Thus rather than starting from one-way functions, they propose constructions of "full-fledged" pseudorandom function families from these limited ones. In particular they propose the cascade construction, and provide a concrete security analysis which relates the strength of the cascade to that of the underlying finite pseudorandom function family in a precise and quantitative way.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Entity Authentication and Key Distribution
Bellare, M., & Rogaway, P. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48329-2_21 · Cited by 1,752
New hash functions and their use in authentication and set equality
Wegman, M. N., & Carter, J. L. (1981) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-0000(81)90033-7 · Cited by 1,402
Cited by
HMAC: Keyed-Hashing for Message Authentication
Krawczyk, H., Bellare, M., & Canetti, R. (1997) · doi:10.17487/rfc2104 · Cited by 2,031
Self-citationA concrete security treatment of symmetric encryption
Bellare, M., Desai, A., Jokipii, E., & Rogaway, P. (2002) · Proceedings 38th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1997.646128 · Cited by 931
Self-citationCryptographic Extraction and Key Derivation: The HKDF Scheme
Krawczyk, H. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14623-7_34 · Cited by 408
Self-citationUMAC: Fast and Secure Message Authentication
Black, J., Halevi, S., Krawczyk, H., Krovetz, T., & Rogaway, P. (1999) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48405-1_14 · Cited by 390
Self-citationModern Cryptography, Probabilistic Proofs and Pseudorandomness
Goldreich, O. (1999) · Algorithms and Combinatorics · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-12521-2 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Bellare, M., Canetti, R., & Krawczyk, H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc. Press
- Published
- 2002-12-24
- Pages
- 514-523
- OpenAlex
- W2148555789
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.44
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pseudorandom functions revisited: the cascade construction and its concrete security. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/sfcs.1996.548510
- The paper
- Bellare, M., Canetti, R., & Krawczyk, H. (2002). Pseudorandom functions revisited: the cascade construction and its concrete security. Proceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1109/sfcs.1996.548510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.