Cited by 896Speech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio ProcessingMusic and Audio Processing

Speaker Recognition from Raw Waveform with SincNet

Open access
Ravanelli, Mirco, Bengio, Yoshua·2018·2018 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT)

Abstract

Deep learning is progressively gaining popularity as a viable alternative to i-vectors for speaker recognition. Promising results have been recently obtained with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) when fed by raw speech samples directly. Rather than employing standard hand-crafted features, the latter CNNs learn low-level speech representations from waveforms, potentially allowing the network to better capture important narrow-band speaker characteristics such as pitch and formants. Proper design of the neural network is crucial to achieve this goal.This paper proposes a novel CNN architecture, called SincNet, that encourages the first convolutional layer to discover more meaningful filters. SincNet is based on parametrized sinc functions, which implement band-pass filters. In contrast to standard CNNs, that learn all elements of each filter, only low and high cutoff frequencies are directly learned from data with the proposed method. This offers a very compact and efficient way to derive a customized filter bank specifically tuned for the desired application.Our experiments, conducted on both speaker identification and speaker verification tasks, show that the proposed architecture converges faster and performs better than a standard CNN on raw waveforms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/slt.2018.8639585

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SincNet employs filters based on parameterised sinc functions, offering a more compact and efficient approach to bandpass filtering; it reduces model complexity while improving performance and convergence speed.

    “SincNet [118] employs filters based on parameterised sinc functions, offering a more compact and efficient approach to bandpass filtering. By optimising only the low and high cutoff frequencies of the filters, SincNet significantly reduces model complexity while improving performance and convergence speed.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning, MIT Press, 2016.
  2. D. Yu and L. Deng, Automatic Speech Recognition -A Deep Learning Approach, Springer, 2015.
  3. M. Ravanelli, Deep learning for Distant Speech Recog- nition, PhD Thesis, Unitn, 2017.
  4. F. Richardson, D. Reynolds, and N. Dehak, "Deep neu- ral network approaches to speaker and language recog- nition," IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1671-1675, 2015.
  5. T. N. Sainath, R. J. Weiss, K. W. Wilson, A. Narayanan, M. Bacchiani, and A. Senior, "Speaker localization and microphone spacing invariant acoustic modeling from raw multichannel waveforms," in Proc. of ASRU, 2015.
  6. L. R. Rabiner and R. W. Schafer, Theory and Applica- tions of Digital Speech Processing, Prentice Hall, NJ, 2011.
  7. S. K. Mitra, Digital Signal Processing, McGraw-Hill, 2005.
  8. A. L. Maas, A. Y. Hannun, and A. Y. Ng, "Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models," in Proc. of ICML, 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ravanelli, M., & Bengio, Y.
Affiliations
Université de Montréal (CA)
Venue
2018 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-12
Pages
1021-1028
OpenAlex
W2887814324
Cited by
896
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 133 · 2022: 162 · 2021: 144 · 2020: 121 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
31.23
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Compute Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
Keywords
speaker recognition, SincNet, convolutional neural networks, bandpass filter, filter bank design, speaker identification, speaker verification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review