Cited by 331Optimal Power Flow DistributionMicrogrid Control and OptimizationPower Quality and Harmonics

Inverter VAR control for distribution systems with renewables

Open access
Farivar, Masoud, Clarke, Christopher R., Low, Steven H., Chandy, K. Mani·2011·2011 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm)

Abstract

Motivated by the need to cope with rapid and random fluctuations of renewable generation, we presents a model that augments the traditional Volt/VAR control through switched controllers on a slow timescale with inverter control on a fast timescale. The optimization problem is generally nonconvex and therefore hard to solve. We propose a simple convex relaxation and prove that it is exact provided over-satisfaction of load is allowed. Hence Volt/VAR control over radial networks is efficiently solvable. Simulations of a real-world distribution circuit illustrates that the proposed inverter control achieves significant improvement over the IEEE 1547 standard in terms of power quality and power savings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/smartgridcomm.2011.6102366

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior sufficient conditions for exactness of the SOCP relaxation require load over-satisfaction on some or all buses and do not hold in practice.

    “these conditions require some bus to be able to draw infinite power, which is referred to as load over-satisfaction in the literature. For example, the conditions given in [9], [13], [14] require load over-satisfaction on some/all of the buses.”

    From Optimal power flow in distribution networks (2018) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction (page not supplied) says the paper’s convex relaxation is exact provided load over-satisfaction is allowed. It does not specify that a bus must be able to draw infinite power, identify which buses require over-satisfaction, or say the condition does not hold in practice. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • All sufficient conditions in the literature that guarantee exactness of the SOCP relaxation require removing some of the constraints in OPF, and do not hold in practice.

    “To summarize, all sufficient conditions in the literature that guarantee the exactness of the SOCP relaxation require removing some of the constraints in OPF, and do not hold in practice.”

    From Optimal power flow in distribution networks (2018) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction says this paper's convex relaxation is exact provided oversatisfaction of load is allowed, supporting the narrower point that its exactness guarantee depends on relaxing a load requirement. It does not say that all sufficient conditions in the literature require removing OPF constraints or that those conditions fail in practice. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The SOCP relaxation is exact if p_i = -∞ and q_i = -∞ for i ∈ N+.

    “Proposition 1 ( [9]) The SOCP relaxation is exact if p i = -∞ and q i = -∞ for i ∈ N + .”

    From Optimal power flow in distribution networks (2018) · cites this paper as [9]

    The introduction (p. 457) says the paper’s convex relaxation is exact when oversatisfaction of load is allowed. The available passage does not state the specific conditions p_i = q_i = −∞ for i ∈ N+, so that formulation cannot be verified from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farivar, M., Clarke, C. R., Low, S. H., & Chandy, K. M.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Edison International (United States) (US)
Venue
2011 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-10
Pages
457-462
OpenAlex
W1978282571
Cited by
331
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
FWCI
31.25
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm) (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power Quality and Harmonics
Keywords
volt/var control, inverter control, distribution systems, renewable generation integration, convex relaxation, radial distribution systems, power quality, IEEE 1547, non-convex optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review