The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning Continuous Control Actions for Robotic Grasping with Reinforcement Learning
Abstract
Robots are nowadays increasingly required to deal with (partially) unknown tasks and situations. The robot has, therefore, to adapt its behavior to the specific working conditions. Classical control methods in robotics require manually programming all actions of a robot. While very effective in fixed conditions, such model-based approaches cannot handle variations, demanding tedious tuning of parameters for every new task. Reinforcement learning (RL) holds the promise of autonomously learning new control policies through trial-and-error. However, RL approaches are prone to learning with high samples, particularly for continuous control problems. In this paper, a learning-based method is presented that leverages simulation data to learn an object manipulation task through RL. The control policy is parameterized by a neural network and learned using modern Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm. A dense reward function has been designed for the task to enable efficient learning of an agent. The proposed approach is trained entirely in simulation (exploiting the MuJoCo environment) from scratch without any demonstrations of the task. A grasping task involving a Franka Emika Panda manipulator has been considered as the reference task to be learned. The task requires the robot to reach the part, grasp it, and lift it off the contact surface. The proposed approach has been demonstrated to be generalizable across multiple object geometries and initial robot/parts configurations, having the robot able to learn and re-execute the target task.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search
Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16961 · Cited by 15,612
Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms
Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., & Klimov, O. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.06347 · Cited by 10,625
Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4 · Cited by 4,276
Domain randomization for transferring deep neural networks from simulation to the real world
Tobin, J., Fong, R., Ray, A., Schneider, J., Zaremba, W., & Abbeel, P. (2017) · 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2017.8202133 · Cited by 3,124 · cited 1×
“However, vision based learning demands an additional sim-to-real techniques with excessive computation requirements due to unrealistic rendering capabilities of simulation engines [26].”
BackgroundLevine, S., Pastor, P., Krizhevsky, A., Ibarz, J., & Quillen, D. (2018) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364917710318 · Cited by 1,971
Emergence of Locomotion Behaviours in Rich Environments
Heess, N., TB, D., Sriram, S., Lemmon, J., Merel, J., Wayne, G., Tassa, Y., Erez, T., Wang, Z., Eslami, S. M. A., et al. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.02286 · Cited by 657
Transferring End-to-End Visuomotor Control from Simulation to Real World for a Multi-Stage Task
James, S., Davison, A. J., & Johns, E. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.02267 · Cited by 208
Learning force control policies for compliant manipulation
Kalakrishnan, M., Righetti, L., Pastor, P., & Schaal, S. (2011) · 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems · doi:10.1109/iros.2011.6095096 · Cited by 161
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- lazaric, 2008, Reinforcement learning in continuous action spaces through sequential monte carlo methods, Advances in neural information processing systems, 833
- konda, 2000, Actor-critic algorithms, Advances in neural information processing systems, 1008
- sutton, 2018, Reinforcement Learning An Introduction
- 10.1109/IROS.2012.6386109 · DOI · Paper page
- fan, 2018, Surreal: Open-source reinforcement learning framework and robot manipulation benchmark, Conference on Robot Learning, 767
- schulman, 2015, Trust region policy optimization, International Conference on Machine Learning, 1889
- 10.1109/ICRA.2011.5980200 · DOI
- duan, 2016, Benchmarking deep reinforcement learning for continuous control, International Conference on Machine Learning, 1329
- levine, 2016, End-to-end training of deep visuomotor policies, The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17, 1334
- deisenroth, 2013, A Survey on Policy Search for Robotics
- deisenroth, 2011, Pilco: A model-based and data-efficient approach to policy search, Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-11), 465
- levine, 2014, Learning neural network policies with guided policy search under unknown dynamics, Advances in neural information processing systems, 1071
- 10.1109/ICRA.2015.7138994 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA.2018.8461044 · DOI
- boularias, 2011, Relative entropy inverse reinforcement learning, Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 182
- 10.1109/ICRA.2018.8463191 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA.2018.8461076 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature14236 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/IROS.2010.5649089 · DOI
- 10.1177/0278364912472380 · DOI
- abbeel, 2007, An application of reinforcement learning to aerobatic helicopter flight, Advances in neural information processing systems, 1
- 10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989384 · DOI
- 10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8968201 · DOI
- 10.15607/RSS.2018.XIV.009 · DOI
Cited by
Salvato, E., Fenu, G., Medvet, E., & Pellegrino, F. A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3126658 · Cited by 200
“Navigation [39], [40], [41], [42] Manipulation [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [3], [8], [48] Motion control [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59] Locomotion [49], [50], [51], [60], [61], [62]”
BackgroundTHE COLOSSEUM: A Benchmark for Evaluating Generalization for Robotic Manipulation
Pumacay, W., Singh, I., Duan, J., Krishna, R., Thomason, J., & Fox, D. (2024) · Robotics: Science and Systems XX · doi:10.15607/rss.2024.xx.133 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Shahid, A. A., Roveda, L., Piga, D., & Braghin, F.
- Affiliations
- Politecnico di Milano (IT)
- University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (CH)
- Venue
- 2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-10-11
- Pages
- 4066-4072
- ISSN
- 1062-922X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3113139432
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (publishedVersion)
- Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
- Keywords
- robotic grasping, continuous control, reinforcement learning, proximal policy optimization, object manipulation, Franka Emika Panda, MuJoCo simulation, reward function design, learning from simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.