Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 54Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobot Manipulation and LearningSoft Robotics and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning Continuous Control Actions for Robotic Grasping with Reinforcement Learning

Shahid, Asad Ali, Roveda, Loris, Piga, Dario, Braghin, Francesco·2020·2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)

Abstract

Robots are nowadays increasingly required to deal with (partially) unknown tasks and situations. The robot has, therefore, to adapt its behavior to the specific working conditions. Classical control methods in robotics require manually programming all actions of a robot. While very effective in fixed conditions, such model-based approaches cannot handle variations, demanding tedious tuning of parameters for every new task. Reinforcement learning (RL) holds the promise of autonomously learning new control policies through trial-and-error. However, RL approaches are prone to learning with high samples, particularly for continuous control problems. In this paper, a learning-based method is presented that leverages simulation data to learn an object manipulation task through RL. The control policy is parameterized by a neural network and learned using modern Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm. A dense reward function has been designed for the task to enable efficient learning of an agent. The proposed approach is trained entirely in simulation (exploiting the MuJoCo environment) from scratch without any demonstrations of the task. A grasping task involving a Franka Emika Panda manipulator has been considered as the reference task to be learned. The task requires the robot to reach the part, grasp it, and lift it off the contact surface. The proposed approach has been demonstrated to be generalizable across multiple object geometries and initial robot/parts configurations, having the robot able to learn and re-execute the target task.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/smc42975.2020.9282951

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. lazaric, 2008, Reinforcement learning in continuous action spaces through sequential monte carlo methods, Advances in neural information processing systems, 833
  2. konda, 2000, Actor-critic algorithms, Advances in neural information processing systems, 1008
  3. sutton, 2018, Reinforcement Learning An Introduction
  4. 10.1109/IROS.2012.6386109 · DOI · Paper page
  5. fan, 2018, Surreal: Open-source reinforcement learning framework and robot manipulation benchmark, Conference on Robot Learning, 767
  6. schulman, 2015, Trust region policy optimization, International Conference on Machine Learning, 1889
  7. 10.1109/ICRA.2011.5980200 · DOI
  8. duan, 2016, Benchmarking deep reinforcement learning for continuous control, International Conference on Machine Learning, 1329
  9. levine, 2016, End-to-end training of deep visuomotor policies, The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17, 1334
  10. deisenroth, 2013, A Survey on Policy Search for Robotics
  11. deisenroth, 2011, Pilco: A model-based and data-efficient approach to policy search, Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-11), 465
  12. levine, 2014, Learning neural network policies with guided policy search under unknown dynamics, Advances in neural information processing systems, 1071
  13. 10.1109/ICRA.2015.7138994 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/ICRA.2018.8461044 · DOI
  15. boularias, 2011, Relative entropy inverse reinforcement learning, Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 182
  16. 10.1109/ICRA.2018.8463191 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/ICRA.2018.8461076 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nature14236 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1109/IROS.2010.5649089 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/0278364912472380 · DOI
  21. abbeel, 2007, An application of reinforcement learning to aerobatic helicopter flight, Advances in neural information processing systems, 1
  22. 10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989384 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8968201 · DOI
  24. 10.15607/RSS.2018.XIV.009 · DOI

Cited by

See all 54

Metadata

Authors
Shahid, A. A., Roveda, L., Piga, D., & Braghin, F.
Affiliations
  • Politecnico di Milano (IT)
  • University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (CH)
Venue
2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-10-11
Pages
4066-4072
ISSN
1062-922X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3113139432
Cited by
54
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10
FWCI
2.77
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (publishedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
Keywords
robotic grasping, continuous control, reinforcement learning, proximal policy optimization, object manipulation, Franka Emika Panda, MuJoCo simulation, reward function design, learning from simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.