Cited by 1,271Stability and Control of Uncertain SystemsAdvanced Control Systems DesignControl Systems and Identification

The robust control of a servomechanism problem for linear time-invariant multivariable systems

Davison, E.·1976·IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

Abstract

Necessary and sufficient conditions are found for there to exist a robust controller for a linear, time-invariant, multivariable system (plant) so that asymptotic tracking/regulation occurs independent of input disturbances and arbitrary perturbations in the plant parameters of the system. In this problem, the class of plant parameter perturbations allowed is quite large; in particular, any perturbations in the plant data are allowed as long as the resultant closed-loop system remains stable. A complete characterization of all such robust controllers is made. It is shown that any robust controller must consist of two devices 1) a servocompensator and 2) a stabilizing compensator. The servocompensator is a feedback compensator with error input consisting of a number of unstable subsystems (equal to the number of outputs to be regulated) with identical dynamics which depend on the disturbances and reference inputs to the system. The sorvocompensator is a compensator in its own right, quite distinct from an observer and corresponds to a generalization of the integral controller of classical control theory. The sole purpose of the stabilizing compensator is to stabilize the resultant system obtained by applying the servocompensator to the plant. It is shown that there exists a robust controller for "almost all" systems provided that the number of independent plant inputs is not less than the number of independent plant outputs to be regulated, and that the outputs to be regulated are contained in the measurable outputs of the system; if either of these two conditions is not satisfied, there exists no robust controller for the system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tac.1976.1101137

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davison, E.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Davison, E.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Published
1976-02
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
25-34
ISSN
0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149087996
Cited by
1,271
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 39
FWCI
16.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
Keywords
robust control, output regulation, multivariable systems, linear time-invariant systems, input perturbation, asymptotic tracking, regulation, stabilizing compensators, integral controller, closed-loop stability, necessary and sufficient conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review