The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonlinear Complementary Filters on the Special Orthogonal Group
Abstract
This paper considers the problem of obtaining good attitude estimates from measurements obtained from typical low cost inertial measurement units. The outputs of such systems are characterized by high noise levels and time varying additive biases. We formulate the filtering problem as deterministic observer kinematics posed directly on the special orthogonal group SO (3) driven by reconstructed attitude and angular velocity measurements. Lyapunov analysis results for the proposed observers are derived that ensure almost global stability of the observer error. The approach taken leads to an observer that we term the direct complementary filter. By exploiting the geometry of the special orthogonal group a related observer, termed the passive complementary filter, is derived that decouples the gyro measurements from the reconstructed attitude in the observer inputs. Both the direct and passive filters can be extended to estimate gyro bias online. The passive filter is further developed to provide a formulation in terms of the measurement error that avoids any algebraic reconstruction of the attitude. This leads to an observer on SO(3), termed the explicit complementary filter, that requires only accelerometer and gyro outputs; is suitable for implementation on embedded hardware; and provides good attitude estimates as well as estimating the gyro biases online. The performance of the observers are demonstrated with a set of experiments performed on a robotic test-bed and a radio controlled unmanned aerial vehicle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Attitude and gyro bias estimation for a VTOL UAV
Metni, N., Pflimlin, J.-M., Hamel, T., & Souères, P. (2006) · Control Engineering Practice · doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2006.02.015 · Cited by 110
Self-citation
Cited by
Wearable sensor-based real-time gait detection: A systematic review
Prasanth, H., Caban, M., Keller, U., Courtine, G., Ijspeert, A., Vallery, H., & von Zitzewitz, J. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21082727 · Cited by 348
A wearable system for gait training in subjects with Parkinson's disease
Casamassima, F., Ferrari, A., Milosevic, B., Ginis, P., Farella, E., & Rocchi, L. (2014) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s140406229 · Cited by 131
Advances in intelligent and autonomous navigation systems for small UAS
Bijjahalli, S., Sabatini, R., & Gardi, A. (2020) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2020.100617 · Cited by 123
Baldi, T. L., Scheggi, S., Meli, L., Mohammadi, M., & Prattichizzo, D. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2017.2720667 · Cited by 96
Cereatti, A., Gurchiek, R., Mündermann, A., Fantozzi, S., Horak, F., Delp, S., & Aminian, K. (2024) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112225 · Cited by 79
SWiBluX: Multi-Sensor Deep Learning Fingerprint for Precise Real-Time Indoor Tracking
Belmonte-Hernandez, A., Hernandez-Penaloza, G., Martin Gutierrez, D., & Alvarez, F. (2019) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2019.2892590 · Cited by 53
LimbMotion: Decimeter-level Limb Tracking for Wearable-based Human-Computer Interaction
Zhou, H., Gao, Y., Song, X., Liu, W., & Dong, W. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3369836 · Cited by 27
Enhancing accuracy and convenience of golf swing tracking with a wrist-worn single inertial sensor
Kim, M., & Park, S. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-59949-w · Cited by 14
Ding, Z., Yang, C., Ma, J., Wei, J., & Jiang, F. (2020) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-019-07911-8 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahony, R., Hamel, T., & Pflimlin, J.-M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1203-1218
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125691646
- Cited by
- 1,751
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 77.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.