Cited by 79Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesInertial Sensor and Navigation

ISB recommendations on the definition, estimation, and reporting of joint kinematics in human motion analysis applications using wearable inertial measurement technology

Open access
Cereatti, Andrea, Gurchiek, Reed, Mündermann, Annegret, Fantozzi, Silvia, Horak, Fay, Delp, Scott, Aminian, Kamiar·2024·Journal of Biomechanics

Abstract

There is widespread and growing use of inertial measurement technology for human motion analysis in biomechanics and clinical research. Due to advancements in sensor miniaturization, inertial measurement units can be used to obtain a description of human body and joint kinematics both inside and outside the laboratory. While algorithms for data processing continue to improve, a lack of standard reporting guidelines compromises the interpretation and reproducibility of results, which hinders advances in research and development of measurement and intervention tools. To address this need, the International Society of Biomechanics approved our proposal to develop recommendations on the use of inertial measurement units for joint kinematics analysis. A collaborative effort that incorporated feedback from the biomechanics community has produced recommendations in five categories: sensor characteristics and calibration, experimental protocol, definition of a kinematic model and subject-specific calibration, analysis of joint kinematics, and quality assessment. We have avoided an overly prescriptive set of recommendations for algorithms and protocols, and instead offer reporting guidelines to facilitate reproducibility and comparability across studies. In addition to a conceptual framework and reporting guidelines, we provide a checklist to guide the design and review of research using inertial measurement units for joint kinematics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112225

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cereatti, A., Gurchiek, R., Mündermann, A., Fantozzi, S., Horak, F., Delp, S., & Aminian, K.
Affiliations
  • Politecnico di Torino (IT)
  • Clemson University (US)
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Cereatti, Andrea
Venue
Journal of Biomechanics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-08
Volume
173
Pages
112225
ISSN
0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400455464
Cited by
79
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 6
FWCI
11.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomechanics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
International Society of Biomechanics
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Inertial Sensor and Navigation
Keywords
inertial measurement unit, joint kinematics, wearable sensors, reporting guidelines, research recommendations, sensor calibration, subject-specific calibration, kinematic modeling, quality assessment, reproducibility, human motion analysis
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Algorithms, Biomechanical Phenomena, Calibration, Humans, Joints, Movement, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review