The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems in Directed Networks With Nonuniform Time-Varying Delays
Abstract
In this note, we study consensus problems for continuous-time multi-agent systems in directed networks with dynamically changing topologies and nonuniform time-varying delays. We have analyzed consensus problems in the following three cases: 1) directed networks with dynamically changing topologies and nonuniform time-varying delays; 2) directed networks with intermittent communication and data packet dropout; and 3) finite-time consensus in directed networks with dynamically changing topologies and nonuniform time-varying delays. We propose a new approach based on a tree-type transformation to investigate consensus problems in all three cases. Some necessary and/ or sufficient conditions are established. Simulation results are also given to demonstrate the theoretical results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788 · cited 3×
“and [8] were extended to the case of directed networks with switching”
BackgroundConsensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems
Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.887293 · Cited by 10,522 · cited 1×
“As a result, many profound theoretical results have been established for cooperative control of multi-agent systems [1], [2].”
BackgroundCoordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
Consensus protocols for networks of dynamic agents
Saber, R. O., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003. · doi:10.1109/acc.2003.1239709 · Cited by 901
Cited by
Zhang, X.-M., Han, Q.-L., & Zhang, B.-L. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2016.2607150 · Cited by 772
Guo, G., Ding, L., & Han, Q.-L. (2014) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2014.03.017 · Cited by 720
Li, K., Ding, S. X., Zheng, W. X., & Hua, C.-C. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2023.3303098 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, Y. G., & Wang, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1607-1613
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2523
- OpenAlex
- W2171731824
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 30.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems in Directed Networks With Nonuniform Time-Varying Delays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.2009.2017963
- The paper
- Sun, Y. G., & Wang, L. (2009). Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems in Directed Networks With Nonuniform Time-Varying Delays. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2009.2017963
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
