The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attitude Synchronization of a Group of Spacecraft Without Velocity Measurements
Abstract
We consider the coordinated attitude control problem for a group of spacecraft, without velocity measurements. Our approach is based on the introduction of auxiliary dynamical systems (playing the role of velocity observers in a certain sense) to generate the individual and relative damping terms in the absence of the actual angular velocities and relative angular velocities. Our main focus, in this technical note, is to address the following two problems: 1) Design a velocity-free attitude tracking and synchronization control scheme, that allows the team members to align their attitudes and track a time-varying reference trajectory (simultaneously). 2) Design a velocity-free synchronization control scheme, in the case where no reference attitude is specified, and all spacecraft are required to reach a consensus by aligning their attitudes with the same final time-varying attitude. In this work, one important and novel feature (besides the non-requirement of the angular velocity measurements), consists in the fact that the control torques are naturally bounded and the designer can arbitrarily assign the desired bounds on the control torques,a priori, through the control gains, regardless of the angular velocities. Throughout this technical note, the communication flow between spacecraft is assumed to be undirected. Simulation results of a scenario of four spacecraft are provided to show the effectiveness of the proposed control schemes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788 · cited 1×
“In particular, the use of graph theory produced many interesting results [5], [6].”
BackgroundCoordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
Cited by
Observer-Based Dynamic Event-Triggered Control for Multiagent Systems With Time-Varying Delay
Cao, L., Pan, Y., Liang, H., & Huang, T. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2022.3226873 · Cited by 340
Robust consensus tracking of a class of second-order multi-agent dynamic systems
Hu, G. (2012) · Systems & Control Letters · doi:10.1016/j.sysconle.2011.10.004 · Cited by 339
Abdessameud, A., & Tayebi, A. (2010) · Systems & Control Letters · doi:10.1016/j.sysconle.2010.06.019 · Cited by 265
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdessameud, A., & Tayebi, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2642-2648
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2523
- OpenAlex
- W2165756371
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attitude Synchronization of a Group of Spacecraft Without Velocity Measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.2009.2031567
- The paper
- Abdessameud, A., & Tayebi, A. (2009). Attitude Synchronization of a Group of Spacecraft Without Velocity Measurements. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2009.2031567
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.