The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal Design for Synchronization of Cooperative Systems: State Feedback, Observer and Output Feedback
Abstract
This technical note studies synchronization of identical general linear systems on a digraph containing a spanning tree. A leader node or command generator is considered, which generates the desired tracking trajectory. A framework for cooperative tracking control is proposed, including full state feedback control, observer design and dynamic output feedback control. The classical system theory notion of duality is extended to networked systems. It is shown that unbounded synchronization regions that achieve synchronization on arbitrary digraphs containing a spanning tree can be guaranteed by using linear quadratic regulator based optimal control and observer design methods at each node.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788 · cited 1×
“the disagreement vector in [5]) as”
Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems
Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.887293 · Cited by 10,522 · cited 1×
“…of networked cooperative systems (or multi-agent systems) has received extensive attention in the past two decades, mainly due to its widespread applications in spacecraft, unmanned air vehicles (UAVs), mobile robots, sensor networks, networked autonomous team, etc. (see [1], [2] for surveys).”
BackgroundCoordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
Cited by
Li, Z., Ren, W., Liu, X., & Fu, M. (2013) · International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · doi:10.1002/rnc.1847 · Cited by 517
Cai, H., Lewis, F. L., Hu, G., & Huang, J. (2017) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2016.09.038 · Cited by 459
Self-citationShen, Q., Jiang, B., Shi, P., & Zhao, J. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2013.2260757 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, H., Lewis, F. L., & Das, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1948-1952
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2523
- OpenAlex
- W2129891269
- Cited by
- 946
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 72.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal Design for Synchronization of Cooperative Systems: State Feedback, Observer and Output Feedback. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.2011.2139510
- The paper
- Zhang, H., Lewis, F. L., & Das, A. (2011). Optimal Design for Synchronization of Cooperative Systems: State Feedback, Observer and Output Feedback. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2011.2139510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
