The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Output-Based Event-Triggered Control With Guaranteed ${\cal L}_{\infty}$-Gain and Improved and Decentralized Event-Triggering
Abstract
Most event-triggered controllers available nowadays are based on static state-feedback controllers. As in many control applications full state measurements are not available for feedback, it is the objective of this paper to propose event-triggered dynamical output-based controllers. The fact that the controller is based on output feedback instead of state feedback does not allow for straightforward extensions of existing event-triggering mechanisms if a minimum time between two subsequent events has to be guaranteed. Furthermore, since sensor and actuator nodes can be physically distributed, centralized event-triggering mechanisms are often prohibitive and, therefore, we will propose a decentralized event-triggering mechanism. This event-triggering mechanism invokes transmission of the outputs in a node when the difference between the current values of the outputs in the node and their previously transmitted values becomes “large” compared to the current values and an additional threshold. For such event-triggering mechanisms, we will study closed-loop stability andL∞-performance and provide bounds on the minimum time between two subsequent events generated by each node, the so-called inter-event time of a node. This enables us to make tradeoffs between closed-loop performance on the one hand and communication load on the other hand, or even between the communication load of individual nodes. In addition, we will model the event-triggered control system using an impulsive model, which truly describes the behavior of the event-triggered control system. As a result, we will be able to guarantee stability and performance for event-triggered controllers with larger minimum inter-event times than the existing results in the literature. We illustrate the developed theory using three numerical examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimal Sampled-Data Control Systems
Chen, T., & Francis, B. A. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-3037-6 · Cited by 2,217 · cited 1×
“The fact that the controller is based on output feedback instead of state feedback does not allow for straightforward extensions of existing event-triggering mechanisms if a minimum time between two subsequent events has to be guaranteed.”
Background
Cited by
Periodic Event-Triggered Control for Linear Systems
Heemels, W. P. M. H., Donkers, M. C. F., & Teel, A. R. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2012.2220443 · Cited by 1,407
Self-citationEvent-triggered communication and control of networked systems for multi-agent consensus
Nowzari, C., Garcia, E., & Cortés, J. (2019) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2019.03.009 · Cited by 655
Zhu, Q. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2018.2882067 · Cited by 486
A Small-Gain Approach to Robust Event-Triggered Control of Nonlinear Systems
Liu, T., & Jiang, Z.-P. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2015.2396645 · Cited by 398
Neural Network-Based Event-Triggered State Feedback Control of Nonlinear Continuous-Time Systems
Sahoo, A., Xu, H., & Jagannathan, S. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2015.2416259 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Donkers, M. C. F., & Heemels, W. P. M. H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1362-1376
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2523
- OpenAlex
- W2118133052
- Cited by
- 846
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 66.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Output-Based Event-Triggered Control With Guaranteed ${\cal L}_{\infty}$-Gain and Improved and Decentralized Event-Triggering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.2011.2174696
- The paper
- Donkers, M. C. F., & Heemels, W. P. M. H. (2012). Output-Based Event-Triggered Control With Guaranteed ${\cal L}_{\infty}$-Gain and Improved and Decentralized Event-Triggering. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2011.2174696
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.