The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coherence in Large-Scale Networks: Dimension-Dependent Limitations of Local Feedback
Open accessAbstract
We consider distributed consensus and vehicular formation control problems. Specifically we address the question of whether local feedback is sufficient to maintain coherence in large-scale networks subject to stochastic disturbances. We define macroscopic performance measures which are global quantities that capture the notion of coherence; a notion of global order that quantifies how closely the formation resembles a solid object. We consider how these measures scale asymptotically with network size in the topologies of regular lattices in 1, 2, and higher dimensions, with vehicular platoons corresponding to the 1-D case. A common phenomenon appears where a higher spatial dimension implies a more favorable scaling of coherence measures, with a dimensions of 3 being necessary to achieve coherence in consensus and vehicular formations under certain conditions. In particular, we show that it is impossible to have large coherent 1-D vehicular platoons with only local feedback. We analyze these effects in terms of the underlying energetic modes of motion, showing that they take the form of large temporal and spatial scales resulting in an accordion-like motion of formations. A conclusion can be drawn that in low spatial dimensions, local feedback is unable to regulate large-scale disturbances, but it can in higher spatial dimensions. This phenomenon is distinct from, and unrelated to string instability issues which are commonly encountered in control problems for automated highways.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
Cited by
Average TimeSynch: A consensus-based protocol for clock synchronization in wireless sensor networks
Schenato, L., & Fiorentin, F. (2011) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2011.06.012 · Cited by 450
Li, S. E., Zheng, Y., Li, K., Wu, Y., Hedrick, J. K., Gao, F., & Zhang, H. (2017) · IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/mits.2017.2709781 · Cited by 434
Distributed Control of Networked Dynamical Systems: Static Feedback, Integral Action and Consensus
Andreasson, M., Dimarogonas, D. V., Sandberg, H., & Johansson, K. H. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2014.2309281 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Bamieh, B., Jovanovic, M. R., Mitra, P., & Patterson, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2235-2249
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2523
- OpenAlex
- W2129248505
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coherence in Large-Scale Networks: Dimension-Dependent Limitations of Local Feedback. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tac.2012.2202052
- The paper
- Bamieh, B., Jovanovic, M. R., Mitra, P., & Patterson, S. (2012). Coherence in Large-Scale Networks: Dimension-Dependent Limitations of Local Feedback. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2012.2202052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.