Cited by 185Fault Detection and Control SystemsAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsSpacecraft Design and Technology

A Data-Driven Health Monitoring Method for Satellite Housekeeping Data Based on Probabilistic Clustering and Dimensionality Reduction

Open access
Yairi, Takehisa, Takeishi, Naoya, Oda, Tetsuo, Nakajima, Yuta, Nishimura, Naoki, Takata, Noboru·2017·IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems

Abstract

In the operation of artificial satellites, it is very important to monitor the health status of the systems and detect any symptoms of anomalies in the housekeeping data as soon as possible. Recently, the data-driven approach to the system monitoring problem, in which statistical machine learning techniques are applied to the large amount of measurement data collected in the past, has attracted considerable attention. In this paper, we propose a new data-driven health monitoring and anomaly detection method for artificial satellites based on probabilistic dimensionality reduction and clustering, taking into consideration the miscellaneous characteristics of the spacecraft housekeeping data. We applied our method to the telemetry data of the small demonstration satellite 4 (SDS-4) of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) and evaluated its effectiveness. The results show that the proposed system provides satellite operators with valuable information for understanding the health status of the system and inferring the causes of anomalies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/taes.2017.2671247

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rule-based expert systems and model-based reasoning methods were developed to overcome limitations of limit checking.

    “Given the need to overcome the limitations of limit checking techniques some rule-based expert systems and model-based reasoning methods were developed [130].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yairi, T., Takeishi, N., Oda, T., Nakajima, Y., Nishimura, N., & Takata, N.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JP)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems
Published
2017-06
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
1384-1401
ISSN
0018-9251 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2593048559
Cited by
185
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 4
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems (publishedVersion)
  • JAXA Repository (JAXA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
JSPS KAKENHI (JP22560779, JP26289320)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
Keywords
satellite health monitoring, housekeeping data, anomaly detection, probabilistic clustering, spacecraft telemetry, data-driven monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review