Cited by 44Emotion and Mood RecognitionFace recognition and analysisAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Human Emotion Recognition With Relational Region-Level Analysis

Li, Weixin, Dong, Xuan, Wang, Yunhong·2023·IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing

Abstract

Recognizing the emotional state of a person within the image in real-world scenarios is a key problem in affective computing and has various promising applications. Local regions in the image, including different objects in the background scene and parts within the foreground body, usually have different contributions to emotion perception of the target person. This, however, has not been well exploited in most existing methods. In this article, we propose to make relational region-level analysis to account for the different contributions of different regions to emotion recognition. For the background scene, we propose a Body-Object Attention (BOA) module to estimate the contributions of background objects to emotion recognition given the target foreground body. Within the foreground body, we propose a Body Part Attention (BPA) module to recalibrate the channel-wise body feature responses to attend on body parts that are more important. Moreover, we propose to model the emotion label dependency in real-world images, considering both the semantic meanings of these labels and their co-occurrence patterns. We evaluate the proposed method on the EMOTIC and CAER-S datasets, and experimental results show the superiority of our method compared with the state-of-the-art algorithms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/taffc.2021.3064918

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SAFER outperforms the closest result reported by Li et al. [39] on the CAER-S dataset by 7.8%.

    “We see SAFER outperforms closest result reported by Li. et al. [39] by 7.8%.”

    From SAFER: Situation Aware Facial Emotion Recognition (2023) · cites this paper as [39]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, W., Dong, X., & Wang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Beihang University (CN)
  • School of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
Published
2023-01-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
650-663
ISSN
  • 1949-3045 (ISSN-L)
  • 2371-9850
OpenAlex
W3135844897
Cited by
43
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61802026, 61806016)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2019RC39)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
facial emotion recognition, attention modules, affective computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review