Cited by 50UAV Applications and OptimizationMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms ResearchAerospace and Aviation Technology

Artificial Neural Network Optimal Modeling and Optimization of UAV Measurements for Mobile Communications Using the L-SHADE Algorithm

Goudos, Sotirios K., Tsoulos, George V., Athanasiadou, Georgia, Batistatos, Michael C., Zarbouti, Dimitra, Psannis, Kostas E.·2019·IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation

Abstract

Channel modeling of wireless communications from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is an emerging research challenge. In this paper, we propose a solution to this issue by applying a new framework for the prediction of received signal strength (RSS) in mobile communications based on artificial neural networks (ANNs). The experimental data measurements are taken with a UAV at different altitudes. We apply several evolutionary algorithms (EAs) in conjunction with the Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) backpropagation algorithm in order to train different ANNs and in particular the L-SHADE algorithm, which self-adapts control parameters and dynamically adjusts population size. Five new hybrid training methods are designed by combining LM with self-adaptive differential evolution (DE) strategies. These new training methods obtain better performance to ANN weight optimization than the original LM method. The received results are compared with the real values using representative ANN performance indices and exhibit satisfactory accuracy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tap.2019.2905665

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With the advent of AI and the deployment of more complex models such as neural networks, CAs offer the potential to be sophisticated interactive systems, assisting customers to handle complaints and acting as learning assistants in tutoring students or employees.

    “With the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) and the deployment of more complex models such as neural networks (Sedik et al., 2022;Goudos et al., 2019;Kushwaha & Kar, 2021), CAs offer the potential to be sophisticated interactive systems, assisting not only customers to handle their complaints but also acting as learning assistants in tutoring students or employees, for instance (Schmitt et al.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goudos, S. K., Tsoulos, G. V., Athanasiadou, G., Batistatos, M. C., Zarbouti, D., & Psannis, K. E.
Affiliations
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • University of Peloponnese (GR)
  • University of Macedonia (GR)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
Published
2019-06
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
4022-4031
ISSN
  • 0018-926X (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2221
OpenAlex
W2921100919
Cited by
50
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › UAV Applications and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerospace and Aviation Technology
Keywords
received signal strength prediction, artificial neural networks, L-SHADE, self-adaptive differential evolution, Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation, hybrid neural network training, mobile communication, evolutionary algorithms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review